From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: remove hctx_lock and hctx_unlock
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 21:15:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211203131534.3668411-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203131534.3668411-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Remove hctx_lock and hctx_unlock, and add one helper of
blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops() to run code block defined in dispatch_ops
with rcu/srcu read held.
Compared with hctx_lock()/hctx_unlock():
1) remove 2 branch to 1, so we just need to check
(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING) once when running one dispatch_ops
2) srcu_idx needn't to be touched in case of non-blocking
3) might_sleep_if() can be moved to the blocking branch
Also put the added blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops() in private header, so that
the following patch can use it out of blk-mq.c.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 57 +++++++++-----------------------------------------
block/blk-mq.h | 16 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index fc4520e992b1..a9d69e1dea8b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1071,26 +1071,6 @@ void blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_complete_request);
-static void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
- __releases(hctx->srcu)
-{
- if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
- rcu_read_unlock();
- else
- srcu_read_unlock(hctx->srcu, srcu_idx);
-}
-
-static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
- __acquires(hctx->srcu)
-{
- if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
- /* shut up gcc false positive */
- *srcu_idx = 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
- } else
- *srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->srcu);
-}
-
/**
* blk_mq_start_request - Start processing a request
* @rq: Pointer to request to be started
@@ -1947,19 +1927,13 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list,
*/
static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
- int srcu_idx;
-
/*
* We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
* we catch bad users of this early.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
- might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
-
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
- blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(hctx);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx, blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(hctx));
}
static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -2071,7 +2045,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue);
*/
void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
{
- int srcu_idx;
bool need_run;
/*
@@ -2082,10 +2055,9 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
* And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is
* quiesced.
*/
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
- need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
- blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx,
+ need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
+ blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx));
if (need_run)
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
@@ -2488,32 +2460,22 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct request *rq)
{
- blk_status_t ret;
- int srcu_idx;
-
- might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+ blk_status_t ret =
+ __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, false, true);
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
-
- ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, false, true);
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, true);
else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
-
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
}
static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
{
blk_status_t ret;
- int srcu_idx;
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
- ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, true, last);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
-
+ blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx,
+ ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, true, last));
return ret;
}
@@ -2826,7 +2788,8 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
(q->nr_hw_queues == 1 || !is_sync)))
blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, true, true);
else
- blk_mq_try_issue_directly(rq->mq_hctx, rq);
+ blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(rq->mq_hctx,
+ blk_mq_try_issue_directly(rq->mq_hctx, rq));
}
/**
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index d516c7a46f57..e4c396204928 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -374,5 +374,21 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
return __blk_mq_active_requests(hctx) < depth;
}
+/* run the code block in @dispatch_ops with rcu/srcu read lock held */
+#define blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx, dispatch_ops) \
+do { \
+ if (!((hctx)->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) { \
+ rcu_read_lock(); \
+ (dispatch_ops); \
+ rcu_read_unlock(); \
+ } else { \
+ int srcu_idx; \
+ \
+ might_sleep(); \
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock((hctx)->srcu); \
+ (dispatch_ops); \
+ srcu_read_unlock((hctx)->srcu, srcu_idx); \
+ } \
+} while (0)
#endif
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 13:15 [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: improve dispatch lock & quiesce implementation Ming Lei
2021-12-03 13:15 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-12-06 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: remove hctx_lock and hctx_unlock Marek Szyprowski
2021-12-06 11:12 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-06 11:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-12-03 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: move srcu from blk_mq_hw_ctx to request_queue Ming Lei
2021-12-03 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: pass request queue to blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops Ming Lei
2021-12-03 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: run dispatch lock once in case of issuing from list Ming Lei
2021-12-03 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: improve dispatch lock & quiesce implementation Jens Axboe
2021-12-03 19:12 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211203131534.3668411-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox