From: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid extending delays of active hctx from blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:33:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220131203337.GA17666@redhat> (raw)
When blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues sets an hctx to run in the future, it can
reset the delay length for an already pending delayed work run_work. This
creates a scenario where multiple hctx may have their queues set to run,
but if one runs first and finds nothing to do, it can reset the delay of
another hctx and stall the other hctx's ability to run requests.
To avoid this I/O stall when an hctx's run_work is already pending,
leave it untouched to run at its current designated time rather than
extending its delay. The work will still run which keeps closed the race
calling blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues is needed for while also avoiding the
I/O stall.
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f3bf3358a3bb..ae46eb4bf547 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2177,6 +2177,14 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long msecs)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx))
continue;
+ /*
+ * If there is already a run_work pending, leave the
+ * pending delay untouched. Otherwise, a hctx can stall
+ * if another hctx is re-delaying the other's work
+ * before the work executes.
+ */
+ if (delayed_work_pending(&hctx->run_work))
+ continue;
/*
* Dispatch from this hctx either if there's no hctx preferred
* by IO scheduler or if it has requests that bypass the
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 20:33 David Jeffery [this message]
2022-02-01 13:39 ` [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid extending delays of active hctx from blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues Laurence Oberman
2022-02-08 2:45 ` Ming Lei
2022-02-14 14:50 ` John Pittman
2022-02-22 14:31 ` Laurence Oberman
2022-02-17 2:48 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220131203337.GA17666@redhat \
--to=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox