public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yuyufen@huawei.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	<wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: avoid housekeeping CPUs scheduling a worker on a non-housekeeping CPU
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:35:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210093532.182818-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> (raw)

When NOHZ_FULL is enabled, such as in HPC situation, CPUs are divided
into housekeeping CPUs and non-housekeeping CPUs. Non-housekeeping CPUs
are NOHZ_FULL CPUs and are often monopolized by the userspace process,
such HPC application process. Any sort of interruption is not expected.

blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() selects each cpu in 'hctx->cpumask' alternately
to schedule the work thread blk_mq_run_work_fn(). When 'hctx->cpumask'
contains housekeeping CPU and non-housekeeping CPU at the same time, a
housekeeping CPU, which want to request a IO, may schedule a worker on a
non-housekeeping CPU. This may affect the performance of the userspace
application running on non-housekeeping CPUs.

So let's just schedule the worker thread on the current CPU when the
current CPU is housekeeping CPU.

Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 1adfe4824ef5..ff9a4bf16858 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
 #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/crash_dump.h>
 #include <linux/prefetch.h>
@@ -2036,6 +2037,8 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
 					unsigned long msecs)
 {
+	int work_cpu;
+
 	if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx)))
 		return;
 
@@ -2050,7 +2053,17 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
 		put_cpu();
 	}
 
-	kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx), &hctx->run_work,
+	/*
+	 * Avoid housekeeping CPUs scheduling a worker on a non-housekeeping
+	 * CPU
+	 */
+	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled() && housekeeping_cpu(smp_processor_id(),
+							 HK_FLAG_WQ))
+		work_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	else
+		work_cpu = blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx);
+
+	kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(work_cpu, &hctx->run_work,
 				    msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10  9:35 Xiongfeng Wang [this message]
2022-02-15  2:29 ` [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: avoid housekeeping CPUs scheduling a worker on a non-housekeeping CPU Xiongfeng Wang
2022-02-15  4:37   ` Ming Lei
2022-02-15  9:32     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2022-02-15  9:38 ` Xiongfeng Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-23  7:48 Xiongfeng Wang
2023-02-23 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220210093532.182818-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --to=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox