public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: song@kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	llowrey@nuclearwinter.com, i400sjon@gmail.com,
	rogerheflin@gmail.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] block: flush plug based on hardware and software queue order
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:30:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311173041.165948-3-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311173041.165948-1-axboe@kernel.dk>

We used to sort the plug list if we had multiple queues before dispatching
requests to the IO scheduler. This usually isn't needed, but for certain
workloads that interleave requests to disks, it's a less efficient to
process the plug list one-by-one if everything is interleaved.

Don't sort the list, but skip through it and flush out entries that have
the same target at the same time.

Fixes: df87eb0fce8f ("block: get rid of plug list sorting")
Reported-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 862d91c6112e..213bb5979bed 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2573,13 +2573,36 @@ static void __blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct request_queue *q,
 	q->mq_ops->queue_rqs(&plug->mq_list);
 }
 
+static void blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_sched)
+{
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *this_hctx = NULL;
+	struct blk_mq_ctx *this_ctx = NULL;
+	struct request *requeue_list = NULL;
+	unsigned int depth = 0;
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+	do {
+		struct request *rq = rq_list_pop(&plug->mq_list);
+
+		if (!this_hctx) {
+			this_hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
+			this_ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
+		} else if (this_hctx != rq->mq_hctx || this_ctx != rq->mq_ctx) {
+			rq_list_add(&requeue_list, rq);
+			continue;
+		}
+		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &list);
+		depth++;
+	} while (!rq_list_empty(plug->mq_list));
+
+	plug->mq_list = requeue_list;
+	trace_block_unplug(this_hctx->queue, depth, !from_sched);
+	blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(this_hctx, this_ctx, &list, from_sched);
+}
+
 void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
 {
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *this_hctx;
-	struct blk_mq_ctx *this_ctx;
 	struct request *rq;
-	unsigned int depth;
-	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
 	if (rq_list_empty(plug->mq_list))
 		return;
@@ -2615,35 +2638,9 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
 			return;
 	}
 
-	this_hctx = NULL;
-	this_ctx = NULL;
-	depth = 0;
 	do {
-		rq = rq_list_pop(&plug->mq_list);
-
-		if (!this_hctx) {
-			this_hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
-			this_ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
-		} else if (this_hctx != rq->mq_hctx || this_ctx != rq->mq_ctx) {
-			trace_block_unplug(this_hctx->queue, depth,
-						!from_schedule);
-			blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(this_hctx, this_ctx,
-						&list, from_schedule);
-			depth = 0;
-			this_hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
-			this_ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
-
-		}
-
-		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &list);
-		depth++;
+		blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list(plug, from_schedule);
 	} while (!rq_list_empty(plug->mq_list));
-
-	if (!list_empty(&list)) {
-		trace_block_unplug(this_hctx->queue, depth, !from_schedule);
-		blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(this_hctx, this_ctx, &list,
-						from_schedule);
-	}
 }
 
 void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-11 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11 17:30 [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix raid rebuild performance regression Jens Axboe
2022-03-11 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: ensure plug merging checks the correct queue at least once Jens Axboe
2022-03-11 17:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-03-11 18:00 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix raid rebuild performance regression Song Liu
2022-03-12  6:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220311173041.165948-3-axboe@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=i400sjon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llowrey@nuclearwinter.com \
    --cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox