From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4971EC433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234127AbiCVLZF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:25:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232938AbiCVLZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:25:04 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E051F623; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 04:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CE79568AFE; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:23:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:23:31 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Garry Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, beanhuo@micron.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] scsi: libsas: Send SMP commands through the block layer Message-ID: <20220322112331.GD29270@lst.de> References: <1647945585-197349-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1647945585-197349-5-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1647945585-197349-5-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Wouldn't it make more sense to have a new member in th Scsi_Host_template that gets called for these request early from ->queue_rq instead of the new request_queue and custome ops? FYI, I think reusing the block layer for all these command is a good idea but the way it is done here seems a bit ugly and not very maintainable.