From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
yukuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix "Directory XXXXX with parent 'block' already present!"
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:54:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204220422.9SM0r5ue-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421083431.2917311-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Hi Ming,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.18-rc3 next-20220421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/block-fix-Directory-XXXXX-with-parent-block-already-present/20220421-163556
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: csky-randconfig-r036-20220421 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220422/202204220422.9SM0r5ue-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: csky-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/746684a4668ee70b284126159a10f98ff7ebb319
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Ming-Lei/block-fix-Directory-XXXXX-with-parent-block-already-present/20220421-163556
git checkout 746684a4668ee70b284126159a10f98ff7ebb319
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=csky SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
block/blk-sysfs.c: In function 'blk_register_queue':
>> block/blk-sysfs.c:841:43: warning: passing argument 4 of 'debugfs_rename' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
841 | blk_debugfs_root, kobject_name(q->kobj.parent));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from block/blk-sysfs.c:13:
include/linux/debugfs.h:252:47: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'const char *'
252 | struct dentry *new_dir, char *new_name)
| ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
vim +841 block/blk-sysfs.c
808
809 /**
810 * blk_register_queue - register a block layer queue with sysfs
811 * @disk: Disk of which the request queue should be registered with sysfs.
812 */
813 int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
814 {
815 int ret;
816 struct device *dev = disk_to_dev(disk);
817 struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
818
819 ret = blk_trace_init_sysfs(dev);
820 if (ret)
821 return ret;
822
823 mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
824
825 ret = kobject_add(&q->kobj, kobject_get(&dev->kobj), "%s", "queue");
826 if (ret < 0) {
827 blk_trace_remove_sysfs(dev);
828 goto unlock;
829 }
830
831 ret = sysfs_create_group(&q->kobj, &queue_attr_group);
832 if (ret) {
833 blk_trace_remove_sysfs(dev);
834 kobject_del(&q->kobj);
835 kobject_put(&dev->kobj);
836 goto unlock;
837 }
838
839 mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
840 q->debugfs_dir = debugfs_rename(blk_debugfs_root, q->debugfs_dir,
> 841 blk_debugfs_root, kobject_name(q->kobj.parent));
842 mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
843
844 if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
845 __blk_mq_register_dev(dev, q);
846 blk_mq_debugfs_register(q);
847 }
848
849 mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
850
851 ret = disk_register_independent_access_ranges(disk, NULL);
852 if (ret)
853 goto put_dev;
854
855 if (q->elevator) {
856 ret = elv_register_queue(q, false);
857 if (ret)
858 goto put_dev;
859 }
860
861 ret = blk_crypto_sysfs_register(q);
862 if (ret)
863 goto put_dev;
864
865 blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, q);
866 wbt_enable_default(q);
867 blk_throtl_register_queue(q);
868
869 /* Now everything is ready and send out KOBJ_ADD uevent */
870 kobject_uevent(&q->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
871 if (q->elevator)
872 kobject_uevent(&q->elevator->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
873 mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
874
875 unlock:
876 mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
877
878 /*
879 * SCSI probing may synchronously create and destroy a lot of
880 * request_queues for non-existent devices. Shutting down a fully
881 * functional queue takes measureable wallclock time as RCU grace
882 * periods are involved. To avoid excessive latency in these
883 * cases, a request_queue starts out in a degraded mode which is
884 * faster to shut down and is made fully functional here as
885 * request_queues for non-existent devices never get registered.
886 */
887 if (!blk_queue_init_done(q)) {
888 blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_INIT_DONE, q);
889 percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(&q->q_usage_counter);
890 }
891
892 return ret;
893
894 put_dev:
895 elv_unregister_queue(q);
896 disk_unregister_independent_access_ranges(disk);
897 mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
898 mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
899 kobject_del(&q->kobj);
900 blk_trace_remove_sysfs(dev);
901 kobject_put(&dev->kobj);
902
903 return ret;
904 }
905
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-21 8:34 [PATCH] block: fix "Directory XXXXX with parent 'block' already present!" Ming Lei
2022-04-21 12:02 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-22 3:01 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-22 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-22 6:43 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 16:37 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-21 17:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-04-22 1:23 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-22 2:52 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 20:54 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-21 23:06 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202204220422.9SM0r5ue-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox