From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com,
geert@linux-m68k.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 2/2] blk-throttle: fix io hung due to configuration updates
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 11:58:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519095857.GE16096@blackbody.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519085811.879097-3-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Hello Kuayi.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:58:11PM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> wrote:
> If new configuration is submitted while a bio is throttled, then new
> waiting time is recaculated regardless that the bio might aready wait
> for some time:
>
> tg_conf_updated
> throtl_start_new_slice
> tg_update_disptime
> throtl_schedule_next_dispatch
>
> Then io hung can be triggered by always submmiting new configuration
> before the throttled bio is dispatched.
O.K.
> - /*
> - * We're already holding queue_lock and know @tg is valid. Let's
> - * apply the new config directly.
> - *
> - * Restart the slices for both READ and WRITES. It might happen
> - * that a group's limit are dropped suddenly and we don't want to
> - * account recently dispatched IO with new low rate.
> - */
> - throtl_start_new_slice(tg, READ);
> - throtl_start_new_slice(tg, WRITE);
> + throtl_update_slice(tg, old_limits);
throtl_start_new_slice zeroes *_disp fields.
If for instance, new config allowed only 0.5 throughput, the *_disp
fields would be scaled to 0.5.
How that change helps (better) the previously throttled bio to be dispatched?
(Is it because you omit update of slice_{start,end}?)
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 8:58 [PATCH -next v3 0/2] bugfix for blk-throttle Yu Kuai
2022-05-19 8:58 ` [PATCH -next v3 1/2] blk-throttle: fix that io throttle can only work for single bio Yu Kuai
2022-05-19 10:42 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-19 8:58 ` [PATCH -next v3 2/2] blk-throttle: fix io hung due to configuration updates Yu Kuai
2022-05-19 9:58 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2022-05-19 12:14 ` yukuai (C)
2022-05-19 16:10 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-20 1:22 ` yukuai (C)
2022-05-20 1:36 ` yukuai (C)
2022-05-20 16:03 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-20 16:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-21 3:51 ` yukuai (C)
2022-05-21 5:00 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-21 3:01 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519095857.GE16096@blackbody.suse.cz \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox