From: Keith Busch <kbusch@fb.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
<bvanassche@acm.org>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<ebiggers@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3 4/6] block/merge: count bytes instead of sectors
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 14:01:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220523210119.2500150-5-kbusch@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523210119.2500150-1-kbusch@fb.com>
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Individual bv_len's may not be a sector size.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 7771dacc99cb..46cbbc10d68d 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -201,11 +201,11 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
* @nsegs: [in,out] Number of segments in the bio being built. Incremented
* by the number of segments from @bv that may be appended to that
* bio without exceeding @max_segs
- * @sectors: [in,out] Number of sectors in the bio being built. Incremented
- * by the number of sectors from @bv that may be appended to that
- * bio without exceeding @max_sectors
+ * @bytes: [in,out] Number of bytes in the bio being built. Incremented
+ * by the number of bytes from @bv that may be appended to that
+ * bio without exceeding @max_bytes
* @max_segs: [in] upper bound for *@nsegs
- * @max_sectors: [in] upper bound for *@sectors
+ * @max_bytes: [in] upper bound for *@bytes
*
* When splitting a bio, it can happen that a bvec is encountered that is too
* big to fit in a single segment and hence that it has to be split in the
@@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
*/
static bool bvec_split_segs(const struct request_queue *q,
const struct bio_vec *bv, unsigned *nsegs,
- unsigned *sectors, unsigned max_segs,
- unsigned max_sectors)
+ unsigned *bytes, unsigned max_segs,
+ unsigned max_bytes)
{
- unsigned max_len = (min(max_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9) - *sectors) << 9;
+ unsigned max_len = min(max_bytes, UINT_MAX) - *bytes;
unsigned len = min(bv->bv_len, max_len);
unsigned total_len = 0;
unsigned seg_size = 0;
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static bool bvec_split_segs(const struct request_queue *q,
break;
}
- *sectors += total_len >> 9;
+ *bytes += total_len;
/* tell the caller to split the bvec if it is too big to fit */
return len > 0 || bv->bv_len > max_len;
@@ -269,8 +269,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
{
struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
struct bvec_iter iter;
- unsigned nsegs = 0, sectors = 0;
- const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio);
+ unsigned nsegs = 0, bytes = 0;
+ const unsigned max_bytes = get_max_io_size(q, bio) << 9;
const unsigned max_segs = queue_max_segments(q);
bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter) {
@@ -282,12 +282,12 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
goto split;
if (nsegs < max_segs &&
- sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) <= max_sectors &&
+ bytes + bv.bv_len <= max_bytes &&
bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len <= PAGE_SIZE) {
nsegs++;
- sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
- } else if (bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &nsegs, §ors, max_segs,
- max_sectors)) {
+ bytes += bv.bv_len;
+ } else if (bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &nsegs, &bytes, max_segs,
+ max_bytes)) {
goto split;
}
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
return NULL;
split:
*segs = nsegs;
+ bytes = ALIGN_DOWN(bytes, queue_logical_block_size(q));
/*
* Bio splitting may cause subtle trouble such as hang when doing sync
@@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
* big IO can be trival, disable iopoll when split needed.
*/
bio_clear_polled(bio);
- return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
+ return bio_split(bio, bytes >> 9, GFP_NOIO, bs);
}
/**
@@ -375,7 +376,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_split);
unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
{
unsigned int nr_phys_segs = 0;
- unsigned int nr_sectors = 0;
+ unsigned int bytes = 0;
struct req_iterator iter;
struct bio_vec bv;
@@ -398,7 +399,7 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
}
rq_for_each_bvec(bv, rq, iter)
- bvec_split_segs(rq->q, &bv, &nr_phys_segs, &nr_sectors,
+ bvec_split_segs(rq->q, &bv, &nr_phys_segs, &bytes,
UINT_MAX, UINT_MAX);
return nr_phys_segs;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 21:01 [PATCHv3 0/6] direct io dma alignment Keith Busch
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] block/bio: remove duplicate append pages code Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-24 14:17 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-24 15:38 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 7:49 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-25 8:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-05-25 13:37 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 14:25 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] block: export dma_alignment attribute Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] block: introduce bdev_dma_alignment helper Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:25 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-23 21:01 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2022-05-24 6:07 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] block/merge: count bytes instead of sectors Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] block/bounce: " Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 14:08 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 14:17 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-24 14:32 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] block: relax direct io memory alignment Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 15:19 ` Pankaj Raghav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220523210119.2500150-5-kbusch@fb.com \
--to=kbusch@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox