From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] blk-iocost: remove the second superfluous current_hweight
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:34:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609073450.98975-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com> (raw)
The commit ac33e91e2dac ("blk-iocost: implement vtime loss compensation")
add the second current_hweight() in the loop of active iocgs list to
get old_hwi to calculate the vtime loss of the iocg.
Since the hwi can't change and the first current_hweight already get
hwa and hwi, so this second superfluous current_hweight() can be
removed. There should be no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
block/blk-iocost.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 33a11ba971ea..3cda08224d51 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
/* calc usage and see whether some weights need to be moved around */
list_for_each_entry(iocg, &ioc->active_iocgs, active_list) {
u64 vdone, vtime, usage_us;
- u32 hw_active, hw_inuse;
+ u32 hwa, old_hwi;
/*
* Collect unused and wind vtime closer to vnow to prevent
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
*/
vdone = atomic64_read(&iocg->done_vtime);
vtime = atomic64_read(&iocg->vtime);
- current_hweight(iocg, &hw_active, &hw_inuse);
+ current_hweight(iocg, &hwa, &old_hwi);
/*
* Latency QoS detection doesn't account for IOs which are
@@ -2271,15 +2271,15 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
/* see whether there's surplus vtime */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&iocg->surplus_list));
- if (hw_inuse < hw_active ||
+ if (old_hwi < hwa ||
(!waitqueue_active(&iocg->waitq) &&
time_before64(vtime, now.vnow - ioc->margins.low))) {
- u32 hwa, old_hwi, hwm, new_hwi, usage;
+ u32 hwm, new_hwi, usage;
u64 usage_dur;
if (vdone != vtime) {
u64 inflight_us = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(
- cost_to_abs_cost(vtime - vdone, hw_inuse),
+ cost_to_abs_cost(vtime - vdone, old_hwi),
ioc->vtime_base_rate);
usage_us = max(usage_us, inflight_us);
@@ -2300,7 +2300,6 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
* Already donating or accumulated enough to start.
* Determine the donation amount.
*/
- current_hweight(iocg, &hwa, &old_hwi);
hwm = current_hweight_max(iocg);
new_hwi = hweight_after_donation(iocg, old_hwi, hwm,
usage, &now);
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 7:34 Chengming Zhou [this message]
2022-06-09 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-iocost: fix vtime loss calculation when iocg deactivate Chengming Zhou
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-iocost: remove the second superfluous current_hweight Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220609073450.98975-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox