From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"mstowe@redhat.com" <mstowe@redhat.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: blktests failures with v5.19-rc1
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:09:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614010907.bvbrgbz7nnvpnw5w@shindev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHj4cs9G0WDrnSS6iVZJfgfOcRR0ysJhw+9yqcbqE=_8mkF0zw@mail.gmail.com>
(CC+: linux-pci)
On Jun 11, 2022 / 16:34, Yi Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:49 PM Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:25:17PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > On Jun 10, 2022 / 09:32, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> > > > >> #6: nvme/032: Failed at the first run after system reboot.
> > > > >> Used QEMU NVME device as TEST_DEV.
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > ofcourse we need to fix this issue but can you also
> > > > try it with the real H/W ?
> > >
> > > Hi Chaitanya, thank you for looking into the failures. I have just run the test
> > > case nvme/032 with real NVME device and observed the exactly same symptom as
> > > QEMU NVME device.
> >
> > QEMU is perfectly fine for this test. There's no need to bring in "real"
> > hardware for this.
> >
> > And I am not even sure this is real. I don't know yet why this is showing up
> > only now, but this should fix it:
>
> Hi Keith
>
> Confirmed the WARNING issue was fixed with the change, here is the log:
Thanks. I also confirmed that Keith's change to add __ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP to
dev_attr_dev_rescan avoids the fix, on v5.19-rc2.
I took a closer look into this issue and found The deadlock WARN can be
recreated with following two commands:
# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:09.0/rescan
# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:09.0/remove
And it can be recreated with PCI devices other than NVME controller, such as
SCSI controller or VGA controller. Then this is not a storage sub-system issue.
I checked function call stacks of the two commands above. As shown below, it
looks like ABBA deadlock possibility is detected and warned.
echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/rescan
kernfs_fop_write_iter
kernfs_get_active
atomic_inc_unless_nagative
rwsem_acquire_read(&kn->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP) :lock L1 for "rescan" file
dev_rescan_store
pci_lock_rescan_remove
mutex_lock(&pci_rescan_remove_lock) :lock L2
echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/remove
kernfs_fop_write_iter
remove_store
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked
pci_lock_rescan_remove
mutex_lock(&pci_rescan_remove_lock) :lock L2
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device
pci_remove_bus_device
device_del
device_remove_attrs
sysfs_remove_attrs
sysfs_remove_groups
sysfs_remove_group
remove_files .... iterates for pci device sysfs files including "rescan" file?
kernfs_remove_by_name_ns
__kernfs_remove
kernfs_drain
rwsem_acquire(&kn->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP): lock L1
It looks for me that the deadlock possibility exists for real, even though the
race between rescan operation and remove operation is really rare use case.
I would like to hear comments on the guess above. I take the liberty to CC this
to linux-pci list. Is this an issue to fix?
--
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 23:53 blktests failures with v5.19-rc1 Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-06-10 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-10 9:22 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-06-10 9:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-06-10 12:25 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-06-10 13:15 ` Yi Zhang
2022-06-10 14:47 ` Keith Busch
2022-06-11 8:34 ` Yi Zhang
2022-06-14 1:09 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2022-06-14 2:23 ` Keith Busch
2022-06-14 2:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-06-14 4:00 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-06-15 19:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-15 22:01 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-06-15 23:13 ` Yi Zhang
2022-06-16 4:42 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-06-16 17:55 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Keith Busch
2022-07-19 4:50 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-07-19 22:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-20 2:27 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-12-19 11:27 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-12-29 18:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220614010907.bvbrgbz7nnvpnw5w@shindev \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mstowe@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox