From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2FBCCA47A for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 06:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237281AbiFNGnm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2022 02:43:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352254AbiFNGnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2022 02:43:09 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2920638D87; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id BE14568AA6; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:43:03 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Garry Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, brking@us.ibm.com, hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/18] blk-mq: Add a flag for reserved requests Message-ID: <20220614064303.GA31683@lst.de> References: <1654770559-101375-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1654770559-101375-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1654770559-101375-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:29:02PM +0800, John Garry wrote: > Add a flag for reserved requests so that drivers may know this for any > special handling. > > The 'reserved' argument in blk_mq_ops.timeout callback could now be > replaced by using this flag. And we should probably do that ASAP, independent of the rest of this series. Otherwise looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig