linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: three misc patches
@ 2022-06-15  2:37 Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock Ming Lei
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-06-15  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Ming Lei

Hello Guys,

The 1st two patches make referring to q->elevator more reliable, and
avoid potential use-after-free on q->elevator in two code paths.

The 3rd patch improves boot time for scsi host with lots of hw queues.


Ming Lei (3):
  blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock
  blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection
  blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[]

 block/blk-mq.c         | 27 ++++++++-------------------
 block/elevator.c       | 10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock
  2022-06-15  2:37 [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: three misc patches Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  2:37 ` Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  6:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-06-15  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Ming Lei

elevator can be tore down by sysfs switch interface or disk release, so
hold ->sysfs_lock before referring to q->elevator, then potential
use-after-free can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index e9bf950983c7..22a89c758f70 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -4438,12 +4438,14 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head,
 	if (!qe)
 		return false;
 
+	/* q->elevator needs protection from ->sysfs_lock */
+	mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qe->node);
 	qe->q = q;
 	qe->type = q->elevator->type;
 	list_add(&qe->node, head);
 
-	mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
 	/*
 	 * After elevator_switch_mq, the previous elevator_queue will be
 	 * released by elevator_release. The reference of the io scheduler
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection
  2022-06-15  2:37 [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: three misc patches Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  2:37 ` Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  6:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-06-15  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Ming Lei, Jan Kara

q->elevator is referred in blk_mq_has_sqsched() without any protection,
no .q_usage_counter is held, no queue srcu and rcu read lock is held,
so potential use-after-free may be triggered.

Fix the issue by adding one queue flag for checking if the elevator
uses single queue style dispatch.

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 18 ++----------------
 block/elevator.c       | 10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 22a89c758f70..112dce569192 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2140,20 +2140,6 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_run_hw_queue);
 
-/*
- * Is the request queue handled by an IO scheduler that does not respect
- * hardware queues when dispatching?
- */
-static bool blk_mq_has_sqsched(struct request_queue *q)
-{
-	struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
-
-	if (e && e->type->ops.dispatch_request &&
-	    !(e->type->elevator_features & ELEVATOR_F_MQ_AWARE))
-		return true;
-	return false;
-}
-
 /*
  * Return prefered queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO
  * scheduler.
@@ -2186,7 +2172,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async)
 	unsigned long i;
 
 	sq_hctx = NULL;
-	if (blk_mq_has_sqsched(q))
+	if (blk_queue_sq_sched(q))
 		sq_hctx = blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(q);
 	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
 		if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx))
@@ -2214,7 +2200,7 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long msecs)
 	unsigned long i;
 
 	sq_hctx = NULL;
-	if (blk_mq_has_sqsched(q))
+	if (blk_queue_sq_sched(q))
 		sq_hctx = blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(q);
 	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
 		if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx))
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index c319765892bb..a2355acd2780 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -612,6 +612,16 @@ int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Is the request queue handled by an IO scheduler that does not
+	 * respect hardware queues when dispatching?
+	 */
+	if (new_e && new_e->ops.dispatch_request &&
+	    !(new_e->elevator_features & ELEVATOR_F_MQ_AWARE))
+		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, q);
+	else
+		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, q);
+
 	if (new_e)
 		blk_add_trace_msg(q, "elv switch: %s", new_e->elevator_name);
 	else
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 608d577734c2..ea6ccaeba643 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ struct request_queue {
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME 27	/* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE	28	/* at least one blk-mq hctx is active */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT       29	/* device supports NOWAIT */
+#define QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED     30	/* single queue style io dispatch */
 
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_MQ_DEFAULT	((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) |		\
 				 (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP) |		\
@@ -616,6 +617,7 @@ bool blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
 #define blk_queue_pm_only(q)	atomic_read(&(q)->pm_only)
 #define blk_queue_registered(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_nowait(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, &(q)->queue_flags)
+#define blk_queue_sq_sched(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 
 extern void blk_set_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);
 extern void blk_clear_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[]
  2022-06-15  2:37 [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: three misc patches Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  2:37 ` Ming Lei
  2022-06-15  6:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-06-15  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Ming Lei, Yu Kuai

commit 364b61818f65 ("blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in
tags->rqs[]") is added to clear the to-be-free flush request from
tags->rqs[] for avoiding use-after-free on the flush rq.

Yu Kuai reported that blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping() slows down boot time
by ~8s because running scsi probe which may create and remove lots of
unpresent LUNs on megaraid-sas which uses BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED and
each request queue has lots of hw queues.

Improve the situation by not running blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping if
disk isn't added when there can't be any flush request issued.

Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 112dce569192..992997f6acbd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3429,8 +3429,9 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 	if (blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx))
 		blk_mq_tag_idle(hctx);
 
-	blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping(set->tags[hctx_idx],
-			set->queue_depth, flush_rq);
+	if (blk_queue_init_done(q))
+		blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping(set->tags[hctx_idx],
+				set->queue_depth, flush_rq);
 	if (set->ops->exit_request)
 		set->ops->exit_request(set, flush_rq, hctx_idx);
 
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  6:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-06-15  6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:37:10AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> elevator can be tore down by sysfs switch interface or disk release, so
> hold ->sysfs_lock before referring to q->elevator, then potential
> use-after-free can be avoided.

The subject probably should really talk about blk_mq_elv_switch_none
as we generally already protect ->elevator with ->sysfs_lock.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  6:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-06-15  6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Jan Kara

> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -612,6 +612,16 @@ int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Is the request queue handled by an IO scheduler that does not
> +	 * respect hardware queues when dispatching?
> +	 */
> +	if (new_e && new_e->ops.dispatch_request &&
> +	    !(new_e->elevator_features & ELEVATOR_F_MQ_AWARE))
> +		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, q);
> +	else
> +		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED, q);

Please just set the QUEUE_FLAG_SQ_SCHED flag directly from the
mq-deadline and bfq scheduler ans drop the ELEVATOR_F_MQ_AWARE
flag.

Otherwise this approach looks good.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[]
  2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
@ 2022-06-15  6:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-06-15  6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Yu Kuai

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:37:12AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> commit 364b61818f65 ("blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in
> tags->rqs[]") is added to clear the to-be-free flush request from
> tags->rqs[] for avoiding use-after-free on the flush rq.
> 
> Yu Kuai reported that blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping() slows down boot time
> by ~8s because running scsi probe which may create and remove lots of
> unpresent LUNs on megaraid-sas which uses BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED and
> each request queue has lots of hw queues.
> 
> Improve the situation by not running blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping if
> disk isn't added when there can't be any flush request issued.

This looks ok.  Another optimization would be to never do this if we
don't have a write cache enabled and thus never ever use the flush_rq.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-15  6:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-15  2:37 [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: three misc patches Ming Lei
2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: protect q->elevator by ->sysfs_lock Ming Lei
2022-06-15  6:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protection Ming Lei
2022-06-15  6:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15  2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: don't clear flush_rq from tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
2022-06-15  6:22   ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).