From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue()
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:29:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620072910.GA11786@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d510cb62-4b19-9ae0-cad4-1ca6756cc3fd@acm.org>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:25:41AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I looked into adding a __bitwise annotation for request flags by
> introducing a new type that is called blk_mq_opf_t. Introducing such a type
> without modifying a lot of code seems difficult to me. This is what I ran
> into:
> * If the type of the operation type constants (REQ_OP_READ etc.) is
> modified into blk_mq_opf_t then their type changes from 'enum req_opf' into
> type blk_mq_opf_t and sparse complains when passing e.g. REQ_OP_READ to a
> function that accepts an argument with type enum req_opf.
> * If the type of the operation type constants is not modified then sparse
> complains about bitwise or-ing the operation type and a request flag, e.g.
> REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_FUA.
>
> I'm not sure how to solve this other than by modifying the functions that
> accept an 'opf' argument into accepting an additional argument (enum
> req_opf op + blk_mq_opf_t op_flags).
I actually always though of one type for the operation plus flags
as we basically always use the together. That might still run into
a lot of problems, but is definitively way simpler and matches how
all the argument passing actually works.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 17:57 [PATCH 0/3] Three small block layer patches Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-iocost: Simplify ioc_rqos_done() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 18:26 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-15 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Rename a blk_mq_map_queue() argument Bart Van Assche
2022-06-15 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 19:31 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-15 0:31 ` Ming Lei
2022-06-15 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 6:24 ` Ming Lei
2022-06-17 18:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-20 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220620072910.GA11786@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).