linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue()
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:29:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620072910.GA11786@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d510cb62-4b19-9ae0-cad4-1ca6756cc3fd@acm.org>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:25:41AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I looked into adding a __bitwise annotation for request flags by 
> introducing a new type that is called blk_mq_opf_t. Introducing such a type 
> without modifying a lot of code seems difficult to me. This is what I ran 
> into:
> * If the type of the operation type constants (REQ_OP_READ etc.) is 
> modified into blk_mq_opf_t then their type changes from 'enum req_opf' into 
> type blk_mq_opf_t and sparse complains when passing e.g. REQ_OP_READ to a 
> function that accepts an argument with type enum req_opf.
> * If the type of the operation type constants is not modified then sparse 
> complains about bitwise or-ing the operation type and a request flag, e.g. 
> REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_FUA.
>
> I'm not sure how to solve this other than by modifying the functions that 
> accept an 'opf' argument into accepting an additional argument (enum 
> req_opf op + blk_mq_opf_t op_flags).

I actually always though of one type for the operation plus flags
as we basically always use the together.  That might still run into
a lot of problems, but is definitively way simpler and matches how
all the argument passing actually works.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-20  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 17:57 [PATCH 0/3] Three small block layer patches Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-iocost: Simplify ioc_rqos_done() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 18:26   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-15  5:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Rename a blk_mq_map_queue() argument Bart Van Assche
2022-06-15  5:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 19:31   ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-15  0:31   ` Ming Lei
2022-06-15  6:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15  6:24       ` Ming Lei
2022-06-17 18:25       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-20  7:29         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220620072910.GA11786@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).