From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3123EC43334 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 05:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244760AbiF1FMS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 01:12:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244765AbiF1FL4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 01:11:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D7526579 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 22:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8443F68AA6; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:11:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:11:39 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fully tear down the queue in del_gendisk Message-ID: <20220628051139.GA22701@lst.de> References: <20220619060552.1850436-1-hch@lst.de> <67dd8d1c-658c-8833-9630-79ade736b348@kernel.dk> <20220620060948.GA10485@lst.de> <1e3f054e-eec6-be87-7039-e2b4260addc2@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1e3f054e-eec6-be87-7039-e2b4260addc2@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:16:03AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 6/20/22 12:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 04:21:39PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On 6/19/22 12:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >>> Note that while intended or 5.20, this series is generated against the > >>> block-5.19 branch as that contains fixes in this area that haven't > >>> made it to the for-5.10/block branch yet. > >> > >> Side note - I rebased on -rc3 anyway because of the series that went > >> into -rc2, so we should be fine there. > > > > It depends on elevator/debugfs teardown series that has not made it > > into -rc3. > > Guess we'll rebase for -rc4 again... As you'd done that, can you consider this series now?