From: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] ublk_drv: add support for UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:44:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220726114405.116013-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726114405.116013-1-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA is one ublk IO command. It is designed for a user
application who wants to allocate IO buffer and set IO buffer address
only after it receives an IO request from ublksrv. This is a reasonable
scenario because these users may use a RPC framework as one IO backend
to handle IO requests passed from ublksrv. And a RPC framework may
allocate its own buffer(or memory pool).
This new feature (UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA) is optional for ublk users.
Related userspace code has been added in ublksrv[1] as one pull request.
Test cases for this feature are added in ublksrv and all the tests pass.
The performance result shows that this new feature does bring additional
latency because one IO is issued back to ublk_drv once again to copy data
from bio vectors to user-provided data buffer. UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA is
suitable for bigger block size such as 512B or 1MB.
[1] https://github.com/ming1/ubdsrv
Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 255b2de46a24..c2d2cd5ab25c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -47,7 +47,9 @@
#define UBLK_MINORS (1U << MINORBITS)
/* All UBLK_F_* have to be included into UBLK_F_ALL */
-#define UBLK_F_ALL (UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY | UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK)
+#define UBLK_F_ALL (UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY \
+ | UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK \
+ | UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA)
struct ublk_rq_data {
struct callback_head work;
@@ -86,6 +88,15 @@ struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
*/
#define UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED 0x04
+/*
+ * UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA is set because IO command requires
+ * get data buffer address from ublksrv.
+ *
+ * Then, bio data could be copied into this data buffer for a WRITE request
+ * after the IO command is issued again and UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA is unset.
+ */
+#define UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA 0x08
+
struct ublk_io {
/* userspace buffer address from io cmd */
__u64 addr;
@@ -163,11 +174,19 @@ static struct miscdevice ublk_misc;
static inline bool ublk_can_use_task_work(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
{
if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) &&
+ !(ubq->flags & UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA) &&
!(ubq->flags & UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK))
return true;
return false;
}
+static inline bool ublk_need_get_data(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+{
+ if (ubq->flags & UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA)
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
static struct ublk_device *ublk_get_device(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
if (kobject_get_unless_zero(&ub->cdev_dev.kobj))
@@ -509,6 +528,21 @@ static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_io *io, struct request *req)
}
}
+static void ubq_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res)
+{
+ /* mark this cmd owned by ublksrv */
+ io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV;
+
+ /*
+ * clear ACTIVE since we are done with this sqe/cmd slot
+ * We can only accept io cmd in case of being not active.
+ */
+ io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
+
+ /* tell ublksrv one io request is coming */
+ io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, res, 0);
+}
+
#define UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS 3
static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
@@ -531,6 +565,20 @@ static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
return;
}
+ if (ublk_need_get_data(ubq) &&
+ (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_WRITE ||
+ req_op(req) == REQ_OP_FLUSH) &&
+ !(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA)) {
+
+ io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
+
+ pr_devel("%s: ublk_need_get_data. op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
+ __func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags);
+
+ ubq_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA);
+ return;
+ }
+
mapped_bytes = ublk_map_io(ubq, req, io);
/* partially mapped, update io descriptor */
@@ -553,17 +601,13 @@ static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
mapped_bytes >> 9;
}
- /* mark this cmd owned by ublksrv */
- io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV;
-
/*
- * clear ACTIVE since we are done with this sqe/cmd slot
- * We can only accept io cmd in case of being not active.
+ * Anyway, we have handled UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA for WRITE/FLUSH requests,
+ * or we did nothing for other types requests.
*/
- io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
+ io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
- /* tell ublksrv one io request is coming */
- io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, 0);
+ ubq_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_OK);
}
static void ublk_rq_task_work_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
@@ -846,6 +890,16 @@ static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
}
+static void ublk_handle_need_get_data(struct ublk_device *ub, int q_id,
+ int tag, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(cmd);
+ struct request *req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[q_id], tag);
+
+ pdu->req = req;
+ io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(cmd, ublk_rq_task_work_cb);
+}
+
static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd = (struct ublksrv_io_cmd *)cmd->cmd;
@@ -884,6 +938,14 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * ensure that the user issues UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA
+ * iff the driver have set the UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA.
+ */
+ if ((!!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA))
+ ^ (cmd_op == UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA))
+ goto out;
+
switch (cmd_op) {
case UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ:
/* UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ is only allowed before queue is setup */
@@ -917,6 +979,14 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
io->cmd = cmd;
ublk_commit_completion(ub, ub_cmd);
break;
+ case UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA:
+ if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+ goto out;
+ io->addr = ub_cmd->addr;
+ io->cmd = cmd;
+ io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
+ ublk_handle_need_get_data(ub, ub_cmd->q_id, ub_cmd->tag, cmd);
+ break;
default:
goto out;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 11:44 [PATCH V2 0/2] ublk: add support for UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA ZiyangZhang
2022-07-26 11:44 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] ublk_cmd.h: add one new ublk command: UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA ZiyangZhang
2022-07-26 11:44 ` ZiyangZhang [this message]
2022-07-27 2:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] ublk_drv: add support for UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA Ming Lei
2022-07-27 3:09 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-07-27 15:48 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220726114405.116013-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=ziyangzhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox