linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: change the blk_queue_split calling convention
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:52:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727155202.GA18260@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <219efcde-fbdb-d379-5c14-874490f8c886@opensource.wdc.com>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:26:13AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >  		/* there isn't chance to merge the splitted bio */
> >  		split->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
> >  
> > -		blkcg_bio_issue_init(split);
> 
> Is removing this init call intentional ? If yes, isn't that a problem ?

No.  This was actually added back in the drivers-post tree by
"block: fix missing blkcg_bio_issue_init" and I messed up the rebase.

Jens, do you want me to send a fixup, or are you going to do it locally?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-26 18:30 bio splitting cleanups v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: change the blk_queue_split calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 23:26   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-27 15:52     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-07-27 16:03       ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-27 15:01   ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: change the blk_queue_bounce " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 23:27   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-27  6:34   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: move ->bio_split to the gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: move the call to get_max_io_size out of blk_bio_segment_split Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: move bio_allowed_max_sectors to blk-merge.c Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: pass struct queue_limits to the bio splitting helpers Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:33 ` bio splitting cleanups v3 Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-27 16:22 bio splitting cleanups v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: change the blk_queue_split calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 16:29   ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-28  1:53   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-28  7:55   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-07-23  6:28 bio splitting cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-23  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: change the blk_queue_split calling convention Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727155202.GA18260@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).