From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A832C19F2B for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231304AbiG1Op3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:45:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232730AbiG1Op0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:45:26 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96B4474C1; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6A6F367373; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:45:20 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Greg KH Cc: Tadeusz Struk , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , syzbot+4f441e6ca0fcad141421@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Johannes Thumshirn , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Damien Le Moal , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/2] block: split bio_kmalloc from bio_alloc_bioset Message-ID: <20220728144520.GA18285@lst.de> References: <20220718211226.506362-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 04:42:35PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a3416231e37024a75f2b95bd95db0d8ce8132a84 > > > > Both now queued up, thanks. > > As was just reported, this breaks things all over the place: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/219030d8-3408-cc9d-7aec-1fb14ab891ce@roeck-us.net > > Note, I also had to add lots of fix-up patches on top of these two that > you missed, so odds are there are other fix-ups that I also missed. > > Please go and test this again, and submit ALL patches that are needed > after they pass the proper testing and I will be glad to reconsider them > again. Why did this even get backported? It was a cleanup that required a lot of prep work, and should not by itself fix anything.