public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, hch@lst.de,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 RESEND #2 2/2] block: add overflow checks for Amiga partition support
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:22:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202208231319.Ng5RTzzg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822211236.9023-3-schmitzmic@gmail.com>

Hi Michael,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.0-rc2 next-20220822]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-Schmitz/Amiga-RDB-partition-support-fixes/20220823-051457
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: i386-randconfig-s002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220823/202208231319.Ng5RTzzg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6b86551e8891f07839a8c3ad19e3f770b0f738e9
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Michael-Schmitz/Amiga-RDB-partition-support-fixes/20220823-051457
        git checkout 6b86551e8891f07839a8c3ad19e3f770b0f738e9
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash block/partitions/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> block/partitions/amiga.c:132:30: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
   block/partitions/amiga.c:133:25: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32

vim +132 block/partitions/amiga.c

    35	
    36	int amiga_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state)
    37	{
    38		Sector sect;
    39		unsigned char *data;
    40		struct RigidDiskBlock *rdb;
    41		struct PartitionBlock *pb;
    42		u64 start_sect, nr_sects;
    43		sector_t blk, end_sect;
    44		u32 cylblk;		/* rdb_CylBlocks = nr_heads*sect_per_track */
    45		u32 nr_hd, nr_sect, lo_cyl, hi_cyl;
    46		int part, res = 0;
    47		unsigned int blksize = 1;	/* Multiplier for disk block size */
    48		int slot = 1;
    49	
    50		for (blk = 0; ; blk++, put_dev_sector(sect)) {
    51			if (blk == RDB_ALLOCATION_LIMIT)
    52				goto rdb_done;
    53			data = read_part_sector(state, blk, &sect);
    54			if (!data) {
    55				pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read RDB block %llu\n",
    56				       state->disk->disk_name, blk);
    57				res = -1;
    58				goto rdb_done;
    59			}
    60			if (*(__be32 *)data != cpu_to_be32(IDNAME_RIGIDDISK))
    61				continue;
    62	
    63			rdb = (struct RigidDiskBlock *)data;
    64			if (checksum_block((__be32 *)data, be32_to_cpu(rdb->rdb_SummedLongs) & 0x7F) == 0)
    65				break;
    66			/* Try again with 0xdc..0xdf zeroed, Windows might have
    67			 * trashed it.
    68			 */
    69			*(__be32 *)(data+0xdc) = 0;
    70			if (checksum_block((__be32 *)data,
    71					be32_to_cpu(rdb->rdb_SummedLongs) & 0x7F)==0) {
    72				pr_err("Trashed word at 0xd0 in block %llu ignored in checksum calculation\n",
    73				       blk);
    74				break;
    75			}
    76	
    77			pr_err("Dev %s: RDB in block %llu has bad checksum\n",
    78			       state->disk->disk_name, blk);
    79		}
    80	
    81		/* blksize is blocks per 512 byte standard block */
    82		blksize = be32_to_cpu( rdb->rdb_BlockBytes ) / 512;
    83	
    84		{
    85			char tmp[7 + 10 + 1 + 1];
    86	
    87			/* Be more informative */
    88			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), " RDSK (%d)", blksize * 512);
    89			strlcat(state->pp_buf, tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
    90		}
    91		blk = be32_to_cpu(rdb->rdb_PartitionList);
    92		put_dev_sector(sect);
    93		for (part = 1; blk>0 && part<=16; part++, put_dev_sector(sect)) {
    94			/* Read in terms partition table understands */
    95			if (check_mul_overflow(blk, (sector_t) blksize, &blk)) {
    96				pr_err("Dev %s: overflow calculating partition block %llu! Skipping partitions %u and beyond\n",
    97					state->disk->disk_name, blk, part);
    98				break;
    99			}
   100			data = read_part_sector(state, blk, &sect);
   101			if (!data) {
   102				pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read partition block %llu\n",
   103				       state->disk->disk_name, blk);
   104				res = -1;
   105				goto rdb_done;
   106			}
   107			pb  = (struct PartitionBlock *)data;
   108			blk = be32_to_cpu(pb->pb_Next);
   109			if (pb->pb_ID != cpu_to_be32(IDNAME_PARTITION))
   110				continue;
   111			if (checksum_block((__be32 *)pb, be32_to_cpu(pb->pb_SummedLongs) & 0x7F) != 0 )
   112				continue;
   113	
   114			/* RDB gives us more than enough rope to hang ourselves with,
   115			 * many times over (2^128 bytes if all fields max out).
   116			 * Some careful checks are in order, so check for potential
   117			 * overflows.
   118			 * We are multiplying four 32 bit numbers to one sector_t!
   119			 */
   120	
   121			nr_hd   = be32_to_cpu(pb->pb_Environment[NR_HD]);
   122			nr_sect = be32_to_cpu(pb->pb_Environment[NR_SECT]);
   123	
   124			/* CylBlocks is total number of blocks per cylinder */
   125			if (check_mul_overflow(nr_hd, nr_sect, &cylblk)) {
   126				pr_err("Dev %s: heads*sects %u overflows u32, skipping partition!\n",
   127					state->disk->disk_name, cylblk);
   128				continue;
   129			}
   130	
   131			/* check for consistency with RDB defined CylBlocks */
 > 132			if (cylblk > be32_to_cpu((__be32)rdb->rdb_CylBlocks)) {

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-22 21:12 [PATCH v9 0/2 RESEND #2] Amiga RDB partition support fixes Michael Schmitz
2022-08-22 21:12 ` [PATCH v9 RESEND #2 1/2] block: fix signed int overflow in Amiga partition support Michael Schmitz
2022-08-22 21:12 ` [PATCH v9 RESEND #2 2/2] block: add overflow checks for " Michael Schmitz
2022-08-23  5:22   ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202208231319.Ng5RTzzg-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox