public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
	ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/8] ublk_drv: refactor ublk_cancel_queue()
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:58:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220921095849.84988-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921095849.84988-1-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>

Assume only a few FETCH_REQ ioucmds are sent to ublk_drv, then the
ubq_daemon exits, We have to call io_uring_cmd_done() for all ioucmds
received so that io_uring ctx will not leak.

ublk_cancel_queue() may be called before START_DEV or after STOP_DEV,
we decrease ubq->nr_io_ready and clear UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE so that we
won't call io_uring_cmd_done() twice for one ioucmd to avoid UAF. Also
clearing UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE makes the code more reasonable.

Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index c39b67d7133d..0c6db0978ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -963,22 +963,39 @@ static inline bool ublk_queue_ready(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 	return ubq->nr_io_ready == ubq->q_depth;
 }
 
+/* If ublk_cancel_queue() is called before sending START_DEV(), ->mutex
+ * provides protection on above update.
+ *
+ * If ublk_cancel_queue() is called after sending START_DEV(), disk is
+ * deleted first, UBLK_IO_RES_ABORT is returned so that any new io
+ * command can't be issued to driver, so updating on io flags and
+ * nr_io_ready is safe here.
+ *
+ * Also ->nr_io_ready is guaranteed to become zero after ublk_cance_queue()
+ * returns since request queue is either frozen or not present in both two
+ * cases.
+ */
 static void ublk_cancel_queue(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	if (!ublk_queue_ready(ubq))
+	if (!ubq->nr_io_ready)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
 		struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
 
-		if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE)
+		if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE) {
+			pr_devel("%s: done old cmd: qid %d tag %d\n",
+					__func__, ubq->q_id, i);
 			io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_ABORT, 0);
+			io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
+			ubq->nr_io_ready--;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* all io commands are canceled */
-	ubq->nr_io_ready = 0;
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(ubq->nr_io_ready);
 }
 
 /* Cancel all pending commands, must be called after del_gendisk() returns */
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-21 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-21  9:58 [PATCH V4 0/8] ublk_drv: add USER_RECOVERY support ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 1/8] ublk_drv: check 'current' instead of 'ubq_daemon' ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` ZiyangZhang [this message]
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 3/8] ublk_drv: define macros for recovery feature and check them ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 4/8] ublk_drv: requeue rqs with recovery feature enabled ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22  0:28   ` Ming Lei
2022-09-22  2:04     ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 5/8] ublk_drv: consider recovery feature in aborting mechanism ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22  0:18   ` Ming Lei
2022-09-22  2:06     ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 6/8] ublk_drv: support UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22  2:13   ` Ming Lei
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 7/8] ublk_drv: allow new process to open ublk chardev with recovery feature enabled ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22  2:38   ` Ming Lei
2022-09-22  3:00     ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21  9:58 ` [PATCH V4 8/8] Documentation: document ublk user recovery feature ZiyangZhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220921095849.84988-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=ziyangzhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox