* [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
@ 2022-10-14 10:01 Hengqi Chen
2022-10-14 16:24 ` Francis Laniel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hengqi Chen @ 2022-10-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block, axboe, rostedt; +Cc: hengqi.chen, flaniel
Currently, several BCC ([0]) tools (biosnoop/biostacks/biotop) use
kprobes to blk_account_io_start/blk_account_io_done to implement
their functionalities. This is fragile because the target kernel
functions may be renamed ([1]) or inlined ([2]). So introduces two
new tracepoints for such use cases.
[0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
[0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
[1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++++
include/trace/events/block.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index c96c8c4f751b..3777f486a365 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -887,6 +887,8 @@ static void __blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
static inline void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
{
+ trace_block_io_done(req);
+
/*
* Account IO completion. flush_rq isn't accounted as a
* normal IO on queueing nor completion. Accounting the
@@ -917,6 +919,8 @@ static void __blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq)
static inline void blk_account_io_start(struct request *req)
{
+ trace_block_io_start(req);
+
if (blk_do_io_stat(req))
__blk_account_io_start(req);
}
diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
index 7f4dfbdf12a6..65c4cb224736 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/block.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
@@ -245,6 +245,32 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_rq_merge,
TP_ARGS(rq)
);
+/**
+ * block_io_start - insert a request for execution
+ * @rq: block IO operation request
+ *
+ * Called when block operation request @rq is queued for execution
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_start,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
+
+ TP_ARGS(rq)
+);
+
+/**
+ * block_io_done - block IO operation request completed
+ * @rq: block IO operation request
+ *
+ * Called when block operation request @rq is completed
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_done,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
+
+ TP_ARGS(rq)
+);
+
/**
* block_bio_complete - completed all work on the block operation
* @q: queue holding the block operation
@@ -556,4 +582,3 @@ TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_remap,
/* This part must be outside protection */
#include <trace/define_trace.h>
-
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
2022-10-14 10:01 [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints Hengqi Chen
@ 2022-10-14 16:24 ` Francis Laniel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Francis Laniel @ 2022-10-14 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block, axboe, rostedt, Hengqi Chen; +Cc: hengqi.chen
Hi.
Le vendredi 14 octobre 2022, 12:01:11 CEST Hengqi Chen a écrit :
> Currently, several BCC ([0]) tools (biosnoop/biostacks/biotop) use
> kprobes to blk_account_io_start/blk_account_io_done to implement
> their functionalities. This is fragile because the target kernel
> functions may be renamed ([1]) or inlined ([2]). So introduces two
> new tracepoints for such use cases.
Thank you for working on this, I was able to build a kernel with your patch
and successfully tested it:
root@vm-amd64:~# uname -a
Linux vm-amd64 6.0.0-rc4-00001-g89f38605b66b #95 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct
14 18:03:58 CEST 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@vm-amd64:~# perf_5.10 record -e block:block_io_done -e
block:block_io_start -a dd if=/dev/zero of=foo count=100
...
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.083 MB perf.data (1 samples) ]
root@vm-amd64:~# perf_5.10 script
dd 313 [000] 273.355898: block:block_io_start: 8,0 W 53248
()>
swapper 0 [000] 273.357048: block:block_io_done: 8,0 W 0 ()
484>
So, I can offer you this:
Tested-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
> [0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
> [0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
> [1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
One small nit:
[0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
[1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
[2]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
>
> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++++
> include/trace/events/block.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index c96c8c4f751b..3777f486a365 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -887,6 +887,8 @@ static void __blk_account_io_done(struct request *req,
> u64 now)
>
> static inline void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
> {
> + trace_block_io_done(req);
> +
> /*
> * Account IO completion. flush_rq isn't accounted as a
> * normal IO on queueing nor completion. Accounting the
> @@ -917,6 +919,8 @@ static void __blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq)
>
> static inline void blk_account_io_start(struct request *req)
> {
> + trace_block_io_start(req);
> +
> if (blk_do_io_stat(req))
> __blk_account_io_start(req);
> }
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
> index 7f4dfbdf12a6..65c4cb224736 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/block.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,32 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_rq_merge,
> TP_ARGS(rq)
> );
>
> +/**
> + * block_io_start - insert a request for execution
> + * @rq: block IO operation request
> + *
> + * Called when block operation request @rq is queued for execution
> + */
> +DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_start,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(rq)
> +);
> +
> +/**
> + * block_io_done - block IO operation request completed
> + * @rq: block IO operation request
> + *
> + * Called when block operation request @rq is completed
> + */
> +DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_done,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(rq)
> +);
> +
> /**
> * block_bio_complete - completed all work on the block operation
> * @q: queue holding the block operation
> @@ -556,4 +582,3 @@ TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_remap,
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
> #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> -
Best regards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
@ 2023-05-20 8:40 Hengqi Chen
2023-05-21 3:51 ` Yonghong Song
2023-05-24 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hengqi Chen @ 2023-05-20 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block
Cc: axboe, rostedt, mhiramat, bpf, yhs, hengqi.chen, Francis Laniel
Currently, several BCC ([0]) tools (biosnoop/biostacks/biotop) use
kprobes to blk_account_io_start/blk_account_io_done to implement
their functionalities. This is fragile because the target kernel
functions may be renamed ([1]) or inlined ([2]). So introduces two
new tracepoints for such use cases.
[0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
[1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
[2]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
Tested-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++++
include/trace/events/block.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f6dad0886a2f..faa1c7992876 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -957,6 +957,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_update_request);
static inline void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
{
+ trace_block_io_done(req);
+
/*
* Account IO completion. flush_rq isn't accounted as a
* normal IO on queueing nor completion. Accounting the
@@ -976,6 +978,8 @@ static inline void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
static inline void blk_account_io_start(struct request *req)
{
+ trace_block_io_start(req);
+
if (blk_do_io_stat(req)) {
/*
* All non-passthrough requests are created from a bio with one
diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
index 7f4dfbdf12a6..40e60c33cc6f 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/block.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
@@ -245,6 +245,32 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_rq_merge,
TP_ARGS(rq)
);
+/**
+ * block_io_start - insert a request for execution
+ * @rq: block IO operation request
+ *
+ * Called when block operation request @rq is queued for execution
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_start,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
+
+ TP_ARGS(rq)
+);
+
+/**
+ * block_io_done - block IO operation request completed
+ * @rq: block IO operation request
+ *
+ * Called when block operation request @rq is completed
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq, block_io_done,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
+
+ TP_ARGS(rq)
+);
+
/**
* block_bio_complete - completed all work on the block operation
* @q: queue holding the block operation
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
2023-05-20 8:40 Hengqi Chen
@ 2023-05-21 3:51 ` Yonghong Song
2023-05-24 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2023-05-21 3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hengqi Chen, linux-block; +Cc: axboe, rostedt, mhiramat, bpf, Francis Laniel
On 5/20/23 1:40 AM, Hengqi Chen wrote:
> Currently, several BCC ([0]) tools (biosnoop/biostacks/biotop) use
> kprobes to blk_account_io_start/blk_account_io_done to implement
> their functionalities. This is fragile because the target kernel
> functions may be renamed ([1]) or inlined ([2]). So introduces two
> new tracepoints for such use cases.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
> [1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
> [2]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
>
> Tested-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
I tested with my local VM, enabled the tracepoint and did
see the trace_pipe printout nicely. If the patch is
accepted, we will enhance related bcc-tools/libbpf-tools with
these tracepoints so they can continue to work with
newer kernels.
Tested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
2023-05-20 8:40 Hengqi Chen
2023-05-21 3:51 ` Yonghong Song
@ 2023-05-24 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-05-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block, Hengqi Chen; +Cc: rostedt, mhiramat, bpf, yhs, Francis Laniel
On Sat, 20 May 2023 08:40:57 +0000, Hengqi Chen wrote:
> Currently, several BCC ([0]) tools (biosnoop/biostacks/biotop) use
> kprobes to blk_account_io_start/blk_account_io_done to implement
> their functionalities. This is fragile because the target kernel
> functions may be renamed ([1]) or inlined ([2]). So introduces two
> new tracepoints for such use cases.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc
> [1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/3954
> [2]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/4261
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints
commit: 03fcc599757cd74dbcf1a5977f9c6497a6798587
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-24 14:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-14 10:01 [PATCH] block: introduce block_io_start/block_io_done tracepoints Hengqi Chen
2022-10-14 16:24 ` Francis Laniel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-20 8:40 Hengqi Chen
2023-05-21 3:51 ` Yonghong Song
2023-05-24 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).