From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <tj@kernel.org>, <josef@toxicpanda.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] block: Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int in struct iolatency_grp
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:12:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018111240.22612-4-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018111240.22612-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
We only need a max queue depth for every iolatency to limit the inflight io
number. Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int to simplfy "struct
iolatency_grp" and save memory.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
block/blk-iolatency.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index 2c574f98c8d1..778a0057193e 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct iolatency_grp {
struct latency_stat __percpu *stats;
struct latency_stat cur_stat;
struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat;
- struct rq_depth rq_depth;
+ unsigned int max_depth;
struct rq_wait rq_wait;
atomic64_t window_start;
atomic_t scale_cookie;
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void iolat_cleanup_cb(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data)
static bool iolat_acquire_inflight(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data)
{
struct iolatency_grp *iolat = private_data;
- return rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, iolat->rq_depth.max_depth);
+ return rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, iolat->max_depth);
}
static void __blkcg_iolatency_throttle(struct rq_qos *rqos,
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, bool up)
{
unsigned long qd = iolat->blkiolat->rqos.q->nr_requests;
unsigned long scale = scale_amount(qd, up);
- unsigned long old = iolat->rq_depth.max_depth;
+ unsigned long old = iolat->max_depth;
if (old > qd)
old = qd;
@@ -386,12 +386,12 @@ static void scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, bool up)
if (old < qd) {
old += scale;
old = min(old, qd);
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = old;
+ iolat->max_depth = old;
wake_up_all(&iolat->rq_wait.wait);
}
} else {
old >>= 1;
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = max(old, 1UL);
+ iolat->max_depth = max(old, 1UL);
}
}
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static void check_scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat)
}
/* We're as low as we can go. */
- if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == 1 && direction < 0) {
+ if (iolat->max_depth == 1 && direction < 0) {
blkcg_use_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat));
return;
}
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static void check_scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat)
/* We're back to the default cookie, unthrottle all the things. */
if (cur_cookie == DEFAULT_SCALE_COOKIE) {
blkcg_clear_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat));
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = UINT_MAX;
+ iolat->max_depth = UINT_MAX;
wake_up_all(&iolat->rq_wait.wait);
return;
}
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static void iolatency_record_time(struct iolatency_grp *iolat,
* We don't want to count issue_as_root bio's in the cgroups latency
* statistics as it could skew the numbers downwards.
*/
- if (unlikely(issue_as_root && iolat->rq_depth.max_depth != UINT_MAX)) {
+ if (unlikely(issue_as_root && iolat->max_depth != UINT_MAX)) {
u64 sub = iolat->min_lat_nsec;
if (req_time < sub)
blkcg_add_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat), now, sub - req_time);
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static void iolatency_ssd_stat(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, struct seq_file *s)
}
preempt_enable();
- if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == UINT_MAX)
+ if (iolat->max_depth == UINT_MAX)
seq_printf(s, " missed=%llu total=%llu depth=max",
(unsigned long long)stat.ps.missed,
(unsigned long long)stat.ps.total);
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static void iolatency_ssd_stat(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, struct seq_file *s)
seq_printf(s, " missed=%llu total=%llu depth=%u",
(unsigned long long)stat.ps.missed,
(unsigned long long)stat.ps.total,
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth);
+ iolat->max_depth);
}
static void iolatency_pd_stat(struct blkg_policy_data *pd, struct seq_file *s)
@@ -944,12 +944,12 @@ static void iolatency_pd_stat(struct blkg_policy_data *pd, struct seq_file *s)
avg_lat = div64_u64(iolat->lat_avg, NSEC_PER_USEC);
cur_win = div64_u64(iolat->cur_win_nsec, NSEC_PER_MSEC);
- if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == UINT_MAX)
+ if (iolat->max_depth == UINT_MAX)
seq_printf(s, " depth=max avg_lat=%llu win=%llu",
avg_lat, cur_win);
else
seq_printf(s, " depth=%u avg_lat=%llu win=%llu",
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth, avg_lat, cur_win);
+ iolat->max_depth, avg_lat, cur_win);
}
static struct blkg_policy_data *iolatency_pd_alloc(gfp_t gfp,
@@ -993,9 +993,7 @@ static void iolatency_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
latency_stat_init(iolat, &iolat->cur_stat);
rq_wait_init(&iolat->rq_wait);
spin_lock_init(&iolat->child_lat.lock);
- iolat->rq_depth.queue_depth = blkg->q->nr_requests;
- iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = UINT_MAX;
- iolat->rq_depth.default_depth = iolat->rq_depth.queue_depth;
+ iolat->max_depth = UINT_MAX;
iolat->blkiolat = blkiolat;
iolat->cur_win_nsec = 100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
atomic64_set(&iolat->window_start, now);
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 11:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] A few cleanup patches for blk-iolatency.c Kemeng Shi
2022-10-18 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: Remove redundant parent blkcg_gp check in check_scale_change Kemeng Shi
2022-10-18 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Correct comment for scale_cookie_change Kemeng Shi
2022-11-01 9:38 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-02 14:11 ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-18 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-11-01 14:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A few cleanup patches for blk-iolatency.c Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221018111240.22612-4-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox