linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yebin@huaweicloud.com,
	Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:36:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019033602.752383-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019033602.752383-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com>

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>

When test as follows:
step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL)
step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL)
step4: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
Got issue as follows:
debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'sda' already present!
debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'sda' already present!
debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'sda' already present!

And also find syzkaller report issue like "KASAN: use-after-free Read in relay_switch_subbuf"
"https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=13849f0d9b1b818b087341691be6cc3ac6a6bfb7"

If remove block trace without stop(BLKTRACESTOP) block trace, '__blk_trace_remove'
will just set 'q->blk_trace' with NULL. However, debugfs file isn't removed, so
will report file already present when call BLKTRACESETUP.
static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q)
{
        struct blk_trace *bt;

        bt = rcu_replace_pointer(q->blk_trace, NULL,
                                 lockdep_is_held(&q->debugfs_mutex));
        if (!bt)
                return -EINVAL;

	if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running)
        	blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);

        return 0;
}

If do test as follows:
step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg)
step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL)
step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL)
step4: remove sda

There will remove debugfs directory which will remove recursively all file
under directory.
>> blk_release_queue
>>	debugfs_remove_recursive(q->debugfs_dir)
So all files which created in 'do_blk_trace_setup' are removed, and
'dentry->d_inode' is NULL. But 'q->blk_trace' is still in 'running_trace_lock',
'trace_note_tsk' will traverse 'running_trace_lock' all nodes.
>>trace_note_tsk
>>  trace_note
>>    relay_reserve
>>       relay_switch_subbuf
>>        d_inode(buf->dentry)->i_size

To solve above issues, reference commit '5afedf670caf', call 'blk_trace_cleanup'
unconditionally in '__blk_trace_remove' and first stop block trace in
'blk_trace_cleanup'.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 50b6f241b5f7..e17bba027a2c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static int blk_trace_stop(struct blk_trace *bt)
 
 static void blk_trace_cleanup(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_trace *bt)
 {
+	blk_trace_stop(bt);
 	synchronize_rcu();
 	blk_trace_free(q, bt);
 	put_probe_ref();
@@ -393,8 +394,7 @@ static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q)
 	if (!bt)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running)
-		blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);
+	blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19  3:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Ye Bin
2022-10-19  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] blktrace: introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper Ye Bin
2022-10-20  8:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-19  3:36 ` Ye Bin [this message]
2022-10-20  8:04   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-19  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] blktrace: remove unnessary stop block trace in 'blk_trace_shutdown' Ye Bin
2022-10-20  8:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221019033602.752383-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).