From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF9C4332F for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230122AbiJSIRm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 04:17:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230089AbiJSIRj (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 04:17:39 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A277C186 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9149F68C4E; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:17:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:17:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei , "Paul E. McKenney" , Chao Leng , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface Message-ID: <20221019081734.GA15255@lst.de> References: <20221017152136.GI5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221017153105.GA32509@lst.de> <20221017224115.GJ5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221018051956.GA18802@lst.de> <9da048fc-71ee-cc38-a861-59acc96671fe@grimberg.me> <20221019072535.GA11402@lst.de> <974a750a-4d18-f559-0247-3d3aa62e620e@grimberg.me> <20221019073231.GA12035@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:57:11AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > On 10/19/22 10:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:30:44AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >>> iscsi defers network sends to a workqueue anyways, and no scsi lld sets >>> BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING. >> >> Yes, but Mike had a series to implement a similar fast path as nvme-tcp >> as while ago that included supporting BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING in the scsi >> midlayer. > > Hmmm, didn't see that, pointer? https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg170849.html >> We'll also need it to convert the paride drivers to libata, >> but those are single request_queue per tag_set as far as I know. > > didn't see paride even attempting to quiesce... The block layer might. But it really does not matter for our considerations here..