From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, hch@lst.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, chaitanyak@nvidia.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] block,nvme,scsi,dm: Add blk_status to pr_ops callouts
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:20:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221030082020.GC4774@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026231945.6609-13-michael.christie@oracle.com>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:19:38PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> To handle both cases and keep userspace compatibility, this patch adds a
> blk_status_t arg to the pr_ops callouts. The lower levels will convert
> their device specific error to the blk_status_t then the upper levels
> can easily check that code without knowing the device type. Adding the
> extra return value will then allow us to not break userspace which expects
> a negative -Exyz error code if the command fails before it's sent to the
> device or a device/driver specific value if the error is > 0.
I really hate this double error return. What -E* statuses that matter
can be returned without a BLK_STS_* equivalent that we couldn't convert
to and from?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-30 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 23:19 [PATCH v3 00/19] Use block pr_ops in LIO Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] block: Add PR callouts for read keys and reservation Mike Christie
2022-11-02 22:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-03 1:54 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-02 22:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-03 2:25 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] scsi: Rename sd_pr_command Mike Christie
2022-11-01 5:33 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] scsi: Move sd_pr_type to header to share Mike Christie
2022-11-01 5:43 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-11-01 16:43 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-02 22:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-03 2:13 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-03 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] scsi: Add support for block PR read keys/reservation Mike Christie
2022-11-01 5:45 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-11-02 22:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] dm: " Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] nvme: Fix reservation status related structs Mike Christie
2022-10-27 17:04 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] nvme: Don't hardcode the data len for pr commands Mike Christie
2022-10-27 17:05 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 5:29 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] nvme: Move pr code to it's own file Mike Christie
2022-10-27 17:06 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-28 16:06 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-28 16:38 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-30 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 5:25 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] nvme: Add pr_ops read_keys support Mike Christie
2022-10-30 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 20:47 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] nvme: Move NVMe and Block PR types to an array Mike Christie
2022-10-27 15:18 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-27 17:06 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-27 17:13 ` michael.christie
2022-10-27 17:16 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-28 16:05 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] nvme: Add pr_ops read_reservation support Mike Christie
2022-10-30 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 20:54 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] block,nvme,scsi,dm: Add blk_status to pr_ops callouts Mike Christie
2022-10-30 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-10-30 23:05 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-01 10:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-05 18:36 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-07 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] nvme: Have NVMe pr_ops return a blk_status_t Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] scsi: Export scsi_result_to_blk_status Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] scsi: target: Rename sbc_ops to exec_cmd_ops Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] scsi: target: Allow backends to hook into PR handling Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] scsi: target: Don't support SCSI-2 RESERVE/RELEASE Mike Christie
2022-10-26 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] scsi: target: Add block PR support to iblock Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221030082020.GC4774@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).