From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A84DC4332F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229533AbiKUNTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:19:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56994 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229885AbiKUNTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:19:07 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA35575D86 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 05:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5853B68CFE; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:19:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:19:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Shinichiro Kawasaki Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "kch@nvidia.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: simplify blk_mq_realloc_tag_set_tags Message-ID: <20221121131903.GA15981@lst.de> References: <20221109100811.2413423-1-hch@lst.de> <20221109100811.2413423-2-hch@lst.de> <20221118140640.featvt3fxktfquwh@shindev> <20221121075857.GA24878@lst.de> <20221121111442.qxyqtsac2bhzhyjd@shindev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221121111442.qxyqtsac2bhzhyjd@shindev> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:14:44AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote: > Thanks, this fix is the better. And I reconfirmed it avoids the block/029 and > block/030 failures. > > I guess it is too late for Jens to fold-in this fix in the for-next branch. > Christoph, would you prepare a formal fix patch? Or if it helps, I can send out > the patch with your authorship and SoB tag (with Co-developed-by tag of mine). I can send the patch. But I'd also be perfectly happy with you sending it as the auther, as my version is just a tiny incremental cleanup.