From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: blktests failures with v6.1
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:50:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221223045041.dl6ivxgo25eiwy33@shindev> (raw)
Hi all,
I ran the latest blktests (git hash: b35866f2d0df) with v6.1 kernel and
observed 5 test cases fail. I call for support to fix them.
List of failure cases
=====================
#1: block/011
#2: block/024
#3: nvme/002
#4: nvme/016
#5: nvme/017
Failure description
===================
#1: block/011
The test case fails with NVME devices due to lockdep WARNING "possible
circular locking dependency detected". Reported in September [1] and solution
was discussed. A kernel fix patch was posted [2]. It may not be the best fix.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220930001943.zdbvolc3gkekfmcv@shindev/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20221012080318.705449-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com/
This test case shows different failure symptom with HDDs. Need further
investigation.
#2: block/024
Fails on slow machines. I suspect test case needs improvement.
Need further investigation.
block/024 (do I/O faster than a jiffy and check iostats times) [failed]
runtime ... 4.347s
--- tests/block/024.out 2022-12-06 20:51:41.525066605 +0900
+++ /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/block/024.out.bad 2022-12-07 12:51:03.610924521 +0900
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
read 1 s
write 1 s
read 2 s
-write 3 s
+write 4 s
Test complete
#3: nvme/002
#4: nvme/016
#5: nvme/017
The test cases fail with similar messages below. Reported in June [3].
Fixes in the test cases are expected.
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220609235329.4jbz4wr3eg2nmzqa@shindev/
nvme/002 (create many subsystems and test discovery) [failed]
runtime ... 119.796s
--- tests/nvme/002.out 2022-12-13 12:42:53.694306873 +0900
+++ /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/002.out.bad 2022-12-13 14:06:35.864050520 +0900
@@ -1,3003 +1,3006 @@
Running nvme/002
-Discovery Log Number of Records 1000, Generation counter X
+Discovery Log Number of Records 1001, Generation counter X
=====Discovery Log Entry 0======
trtype: loop
-subnqn: blktests-subsystem-0
+subnqn: nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/nvme/002.out /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/002.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
nvme/016 (create/delete many NVMeOF block device-backed ns and test discovery) [failed]
runtime ... 46.695s
--- tests/nvme/016.out 2022-12-13 12:42:53.706306913 +0900
+++ /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/016.out.bad 2022-12-13 14:12:30.566239949 +0900
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
Running nvme/016
-Discovery Log Number of Records 1, Generation counter X
+Discovery Log Number of Records 2, Generation counter X
=====Discovery Log Entry 0======
trtype: loop
+subnqn: nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery
+=====Discovery Log Entry 1======
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/nvme/016.out /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/016.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
nvme/017 (create/delete many file-ns and test discovery) [failed]
runtime ... 81.274s
--- tests/nvme/017.out 2022-12-13 12:42:53.707306917 +0900
+++ /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/017.out.bad 2022-12-13 14:13:52.828515799 +0900
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
Running nvme/017
-Discovery Log Number of Records 1, Generation counter X
+Discovery Log Number of Records 2, Generation counter X
=====Discovery Log Entry 0======
trtype: loop
+subnqn: nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery
+=====Discovery Log Entry 1======
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/nvme/017.out /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/sets/blktests/log/runlog/nodev/nvme/017.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
--
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-23 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-23 4:50 Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2022-12-23 7:23 ` blktests failures with v6.1 Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-06 7:14 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-02-06 13:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-07 4:07 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221223045041.dl6ivxgo25eiwy33@shindev \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox