From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C87EC4332F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233409AbiL2Ncr (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:32:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51662 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233302AbiL2NcU (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:32:20 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DA56240 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:31:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1672320694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1D/AekxKLpAcu+bYl7a0bmZjxWv5ZDkXjJgeYIo+ziA=; b=A8FCwENg4lfwHjerPdCCN7PAHQml/Go7Oii6d5xcYY+9DzUP+IAtnQ94WVdFV0xMD6a5uL rBOnEj/yz3oYNOUuaW7f2SBk5510Hhl0L0NdClSNGpHkWimNZ/4HeYXxQ/3zy6CExrBEK4 uH9JMIZdUPkFe00CWiTtmlgOq99pVrg= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-643-LCUTScvNOsCTsEZWZDZswA-1; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:31:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: LCUTScvNOsCTsEZWZDZswA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m38-20020a05600c3b2600b003d1fc5f1f80so12668819wms.1 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:31:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1D/AekxKLpAcu+bYl7a0bmZjxWv5ZDkXjJgeYIo+ziA=; b=z5niHOfcpVJRinC/m0xzHQEthIwDwVQsf1FHo5oJJD1Qcl9Gk9xksfiUkYzFiKhV1h 2e2Pzy2CHPdc3NvuB3aykrNjDfS45HH6Bcjb4T3I3QnqwngOia9rov3hgtIU7knFmQ3o IEYerYZGOjp6uyyOhcndxlq4DqMjpfdVyR+/LGqcvD5EFQbAb9RHgC4kNGeGMRAtliGT Drf2cEG3HGdg+cvN9xlq2DVzEOECDXZOI6oYhlCKitJF+IWrsSo+HUVrUx4/Tv5l6WhZ zsLP8BZ3+p8zmh8742iIKqVAEaTyr8wNR+mgHOsMzGP/HqAS9ak80MR7S3R5LQgeqKZF qtYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqHFtitX1zZlznRpxbSBZbqlGJdOVlKXTofkauMkYJ5UtFwEsfD oD7Jabho1cezEEeFQOUIHX2o90KHmZEcHrn5zB3kB2P0765Zn1e+23tgBH7eCoFjjVHChWuA7cA tQ3oF18r7fL72nLlWf6pfOlc= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e409:0:b0:242:45e7:db17 with SMTP id g9-20020adfe409000000b0024245e7db17mr16250526wrm.66.1672320691716; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:31:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsWnvN6QyVN1zTOnSfNKEdIudugUP7fkbiKn5gbdcdRZxKN6fb0RQ8JfBa58bamIqgqaTnuhg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e409:0:b0:242:45e7:db17 with SMTP id g9-20020adfe409000000b0024245e7db17mr16250519wrm.66.1672320691497; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([2.52.151.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c17-20020adffb51000000b0027cb20605e3sm10757933wrs.105.2022.12.29.05.31.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 05:31:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:31:26 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Alvaro Karsz Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Jason Wang , Paolo Bonzini , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio_blk: add VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature support Message-ID: <20221229082943-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20221219122155.333099-1-alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com> <20221229030850-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 02:08:34PM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote: > > So due to my mistake this got pushed out to next linux release. > > Sorry :( > > No problem at all :) > > > I'd like to use this opportunity to write a new better > > interface that actually works with modern backends, > > and add it to the virtio spec. > > > > Do you think you can take up this task? > > Sure, I can do it. > So, the idea is to: > > * Drop this patch > * Implement a new, more general virtio block feature for virtio spec > * Add linux support for the new feature > > right? That's certainly an option. Let's start with point 2, and get ack from people who objected to this feature. -- MST