From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, jack@suse.cz
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, qiulaibin@huawei.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] A few bugfix and cleanup patches to blk-mq
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 04:11:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230209201116.579809-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
Hi, this patchset contains a few bugfix patches to avoid recalculation
race, mark active before allocating tag in blk_mq_get_tag and some a
few random cleanup patches.
Kemeng Shi (7):
blk-mq: sync wake_batch update and users number change
blk-mq: count changed hctx as active in blk_mq_get_tag
blk-mq: remove wake_batch recalculation for reserved tags
blk-mq: remove unnecessary bit clear in __blk_mq_alloc_requests_batch
blk-mq: remove unnecessary "set->queue_depth == 0" check in
blk_mq_alloc_set_map_and_rqs
blk-mq: Remove unnecessary hctx check in function
blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx
blk-mq: remove stale comment of function called for iterated request
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
block/blk-mq.c | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.30.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 20:11 Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: sync wake_batch update and users number change Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 13:43 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: count changed hctx as active in blk_mq_get_tag Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: remove wake_batch recalculation for reserved tags Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: remove unnecessary bit clear in __blk_mq_alloc_requests_batch Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq: remove unnecessary "set->queue_depth == 0" check in blk_mq_alloc_set_map_and_rqs Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: Remove unnecessary hctx check in function blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Kemeng Shi
2023-02-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: remove stale comment of function called for iterated request Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230209201116.579809-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiulaibin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox