From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Split and submit bios in LBA order
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 07:03:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321060307.GB18078@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320234905.3832131-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:49:04PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Submit the bio fragment with the lowest LBA first. This approach prevents
> write errors when submitting large bios to host-managed zoned block devices.
> This patch only modifies the behavior of drivers that call
> bio_split_to_limits() directly. This includes DRBD, pktcdvd, dm, md and
> the NVMe multipath code.
Umm, doesn't it also change how blk-mq splits, which is the prime
reason why you're looking into that?
> + if (current->bio_list) {
> + /*
> + * The caller will submit the first half ('split')
> + * before the second half ('bio').
> + */
> + bio_chain(split, bio);
> + submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> + return split;
> + }
> + /*
> + * Submit the first half ('split') let the caller submit the
> + * second half ('bio').
> + */
> + *nr_segs = bio_chain_nr_segments(bio, lim);
> + bio_chain(split, bio);
> + submit_bio_noacct(split);
I'm really confused on why you want to change the behavior here
for the case where run in a stacking context vs not, and neither
the comments nor the commit log help me trying to figure out why.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 23:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] Submit zoned requests in LBA order per zone Bart Van Assche
2023-03-20 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: Split blk_recalc_rq_segments() Bart Van Assche
2023-03-20 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Split and submit bios in LBA order Bart Van Assche
2023-03-21 6:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-21 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-21 18:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-23 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-20 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: Preserve LBA order when requeuing Bart Van Assche
2023-03-21 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-21 14:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-23 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230321060307.GB18078@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox