Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@fastmail.com>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests 2/2] nvme/047: add test for uring-passthrough
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 17:07:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230407080746.tx4sgperc6pvjsbu@shinhome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230331034414.42024-3-joshi.k@samsung.com>

Thanks for the patch. I think it's good to have this test case to cover the
uring-passthrough codes in the nvme driver code. Please find my comments in
line.

Also, I ran the new test case on my Fedora system using QEMU NVME device and
found the test case fails with errors like,

    fio: io_u error on file /dev/ng0n1: Permission denied: read offset=266240, buflen=4096

I took a look in this and learned that SELinux on my system does not allow
IORING_OP_URING_CMD by default. I needed to do "setenforce 0" or add a local
policy to allow IORING_OP_URING_CMD so that the test case passes.

I think this test case should check this security requirement. I'm not sure what
is the best way to do it. One idea is to just run fio with io_uring_cmd engine
and check its error message. I created a patch below, and it looks working on my
system. I suggest to add it, unless anyone knows other better way.

diff --git a/tests/nvme/047 b/tests/nvme/047
index a0cc8b2..30961ff 100755
--- a/tests/nvme/047
+++ b/tests/nvme/047
@@ -14,6 +14,22 @@ requires() {
 	_have_fio_ver 3 33
 }
 
+device_requires() {
+	local ngdev=${TEST_DEV/nvme/ng}
+	local fio_output
+
+	if fio_output=$(fio --name=check --size=4k --filename="$ngdev" \
+			    --rw=read --ioengine=io_uring_cmd 2>&1); then
+		return 0
+	fi
+	if grep -qe "Permission denied" <<< "$fio_output"; then
+		SKIP_REASONS+=("IORING_OP_URING_CMD is not allowed for $ngdev")
+	else
+		SKIP_REASONS+=("IORING_OP_URING_CMD check for $ngdev failed")
+	fi
+	return 1
+}
+
 test_device() {
 	echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
 	local ngdev=${TEST_DEV/nvme/ng}


On Mar 31, 2023 / 09:14, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> User can communicate to NVMe char device (/dev/ngXnY) using the
> uring-passthrough interface. This test exercises some of these
> communication pathways, using the 'io_uring_cmd' ioengine of fio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
> ---
>  tests/nvme/047     | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/nvme/047.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/nvme/047
>  create mode 100644 tests/nvme/047.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/047 b/tests/nvme/047
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..a0cc8b2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/nvme/047
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
> +# Copyright (C) 2023 Kanchan Joshi, Samsung Electronics
> +# Test exercising uring passthrough IO on nvme char device
> +
> +. tests/nvme/rc
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="basic test for uring-passthrough io on /dev/ngX"
> +QUICK=1
> +
> +requires() {
> +	_nvme_requires
> +	_have_kver 6 1

In general, it's the better not to depend on version number to check dependency.
Is kernel version the only way to check the kernel dependency?

Also, I think this test case assumes that the kernel is built with
CONFIG_IO_URING. I suggest to add "_have_kernel_option IO_URING" to ensure it.

> +	_have_fio_ver 3 33

Is io_uring_cmd engine the reason to check this fio version? If so, I suggest to
check "fio --enghelp" output. We can add a new helper function with name like
_have_fio_io_uring_cmd_engine. _have_fio_zbd_zonemode in common/fio can be a
reference.

> +}
> +
> +test_device() {
> +	echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
> +	local ngdev=${TEST_DEV/nvme/ng}
> +	local common_args=(
> +		--size=1M
> +		--filename="$ngdev"
> +		--bs=4k
> +		--rw=randread
> +		--numjobs=2
> +		--iodepth=8
> +		--name=randread
> +		--ioengine=io_uring_cmd
> +		--cmd_type=nvme
> +		--time_based
> +		--runtime=2
> +	)
> +	#plain read test
> +	_run_fio "${common_args[@]}"
> +
> +	#read with iopoll
> +	_run_fio "${common_args[@]}" --hipri
> +
> +	#read with fixedbufs
> +	_run_fio "${common_args[@]}" --fixedbufs
> +
> +	#if ! _run_fio "${common_args[@]}" >> "${FULL}" 2>&1; then
> +	#	echo "Error: uring-passthru read failed"
> +	#fi

I think you are aware of the comment lines :)

> +	echo "Test complete"
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/047.out b/tests/nvme/047.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..915d0a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/nvme/047.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +Running nvme/047
> +Test complete
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-07  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20230331034524epcas5p31c3793c0c2071846ed82ff0f1369e90d@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2023-03-31  3:44 ` [PATCH blktests 0/2] nvme uring-passthrough test Kanchan Joshi
2023-03-31  3:44   ` [PATCH blktests 1/2] common,fio: helper for version check Kanchan Joshi
2023-03-31  3:44   ` [PATCH blktests 2/2] nvme/047: add test for uring-passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2023-04-07  8:07     ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2023-04-10  0:43       ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2023-04-10 12:43       ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-04-11  1:35         ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230407080746.tx4sgperc6pvjsbu@shinhome \
    --to=shinichiro@fastmail.com \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox