From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24EC77B73 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229520AbjDLEnz (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:43:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57828 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229492AbjDLEny (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:43:54 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383FA2D57; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 224E568BFE; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:43:48 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Damien Le Moal Cc: Niklas Cassel , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Bart Van Assche , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/19] scsi: allow enabling and disabling command duration limits Message-ID: <20230412044348.GA17806@lst.de> References: <20230406113252.41211-1-nks@flawful.org> <20230406113252.41211-10-nks@flawful.org> <20230411061648.GD18719@lst.de> <20230411072317.GA22683@lst.de> <15ad7cf9-e385-9cea-964a-4a2eac35385c@kernel.org> <85d6ea79-eda1-de58-6ce4-1fab90335ac8@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <85d6ea79-eda1-de58-6ce4-1fab90335ac8@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 09:59:30AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Good point. If we move the code for cdl_enable to libata, then we will not be > covering the SAS HBA cases. > > Christoph, > > I do not see a cleaner solution... Can we keep this patch as is ? Any other idea ? I guess we have to. But it's really ugly and someone in T13 really needs to be slapped..