From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: mwilck@suse.com
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: don't wait for quiesce in scsi_stop_queue()
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 07:46:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230608054611.GC11554@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607182249.22623-6-mwilck@suse.com>
Looks good. Per the discussion on the last patch it probably makes
sense to move this patch before the replacement for patch 2.
Btw, your mail address for Bart is very, very outdated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 18:22 [PATCH v3 0/8] scsi: fixes for targets with many LUNs, and scsi_target_block rework mwilck
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] bsg: increase number of devices mwilck
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sg: " mwilck
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: merge scsi_internal_device_block() and device_block() mwilck
2023-06-07 19:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-08 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: call scsi_stop_queue() without state_mutex held mwilck
2023-06-07 19:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-07 19:37 ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-07 20:07 ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-08 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-08 14:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-08 18:54 ` Mike Christie
2023-06-12 11:15 ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-12 13:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: don't wait for quiesce in scsi_stop_queue() mwilck
2023-06-08 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: don't wait for quiesce in scsi_device_block() mwilck
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: have scsi_target_block() expect a scsi_target parent argument mwilck
2023-06-08 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: add Scsi_Host argument to scsi_target_block() mwilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230608054611.GC11554@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).