Re: [PATCH -next v2] blk-mq: fix potential io hang by wrong 'wake_batch'

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Sat 10-06-23 10:30:43, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> In __blk_mq_tag_busy/idle(), updating 'active_queues' and calculating
> 'wake_batch' is not atomic:
> 
> t1:			t2:
> _blk_mq_tag_busy	blk_mq_tag_busy
> inc active_queues
> // assume 1->2
> 			inc active_queues
> 			// 2 -> 3
> 			blk_mq_update_wake_batch
> 			// calculate based on 3
> blk_mq_update_wake_batch
> /* calculate based on 2, while active_queues is actually 3. */
> 
> Fix this problem by protecting them wih 'tags->lock', this is not a hot
> path, so performance should not be concerned. And now that all writers
> are inside the lock, switch 'actives_queues' from atomic to unsigned
> int.
> 
> Fixes: 180dccb0dba4 ("blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - switch 'active_queues' from atomic to unsigned int.
> 
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c |  2 +-
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  block/blk-mq.h         |  3 +--
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 +--
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> index 68165a50951b..c3b5930106b2 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(struct seq_file *m,
>  	seq_printf(m, "nr_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_tags);
>  	seq_printf(m, "nr_reserved_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_reserved_tags);
>  	seq_printf(m, "active_queues=%d\n",
> -		   atomic_read(&tags->active_queues));
> +		   READ_ONCE(tags->active_queues));
>  
>  	seq_puts(m, "\nbitmap_tags:\n");
>  	sbitmap_queue_show(&tags->bitmap_tags, m);
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index dfd81cab5788..cc57e2dd9a0b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static void blk_mq_update_wake_batch(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>  void __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  {
>  	unsigned int users;
> +	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * calling test_bit() prior to test_and_set_bit() is intentional,
> @@ -55,9 +56,11 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  			return;
>  	}
>  
> -	users = atomic_inc_return(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> -
> -	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock);
> +	users = tags->active_queues + 1;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(tags->active_queues, users);
> +	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(tags, users);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -90,9 +93,11 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  			return;
>  	}
>  
> -	users = atomic_dec_return(&tags->active_queues);
> -
> +	spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock);
> +	users = tags->active_queues - 1;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(tags->active_queues, users);
>  	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(tags, users);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock);
>  
>  	blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
>  }
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 8c642e9f32f1..1743857e0b01 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -412,8 +412,7 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  			return true;
>  	}
>  
> -	users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> -
> +	users = READ_ONCE(hctx->tags->active_queues);
>  	if (!users)
>  		return true;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 59b52ec155b1..f401067ac03a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -739,8 +739,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>  struct blk_mq_tags {
>  	unsigned int nr_tags;
>  	unsigned int nr_reserved_tags;
> -
> -	atomic_t active_queues;
> +	unsigned int active_queues;
>  
>  	struct sbitmap_queue bitmap_tags;
>  	struct sbitmap_queue breserved_tags;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR