From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 19:03:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230629110359.1111832-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629110359.1111832-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
If request need to be completed remotely, we insert it into percpu llist,
and smp_call_function_single_async() if llist is empty previously.
We don't need to use per-rq csd, percpu csd is enough. And the size of
struct request is decreased by 24 bytes.
This way is cleaner, and looks correct, given block softirq is guaranteed to be
scheduled to consume the list if one new request is added to this percpu list,
either smp_call_function_single_async() returns -EBUSY or 0.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
v2:
- Change to use call_single_data_t, which avoid to use 2 cache lines
for 1 csd, as suggested by Ming Lei.
- Improve the commit log, the explanation is copied from Ming Lei.
---
block/blk-mq.c | 12 ++++++++----
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 5 +----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index decb6ab2d508..e52200edd2b1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include "blk-ioprio.h"
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, blk_cpu_done);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(call_single_data_t, blk_cpu_csd);
static void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, blk_insert_t flags);
static void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq,
@@ -1156,13 +1157,13 @@ static void blk_mq_complete_send_ipi(struct request *rq)
{
struct llist_head *list;
unsigned int cpu;
+ call_single_data_t *csd;
cpu = rq->mq_ctx->cpu;
list = &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu);
- if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, list)) {
- INIT_CSD(&rq->csd, __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, rq);
- smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
- }
+ csd = &per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, cpu);
+ if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, list))
+ smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, csd);
}
static void blk_mq_raise_softirq(struct request *rq)
@@ -4796,6 +4797,9 @@ static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
init_llist_head(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, i));
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ INIT_CSD(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, i),
+ __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, NULL);
open_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, blk_done_softirq);
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_BLOCK_SOFTIRQ_DEAD,
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index f401067ac03a..070551197c0e 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -182,10 +182,7 @@ struct request {
rq_end_io_fn *saved_end_io;
} flush;
- union {
- struct __call_single_data csd;
- u64 fifo_time;
- };
+ u64 fifo_time;
/*
* completion callback.
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-29 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 11:03 [PATCH v2 0/4] blk-mq: optimize the size of struct request chengming.zhou
2023-06-29 11:03 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
2023-07-05 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd Ming Lei
2023-07-06 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-06 14:23 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-07-06 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-29 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] blk-flush: count inflight flush_data requests chengming.zhou
2023-07-05 15:10 ` Ming Lei
2023-07-06 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-29 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] blk-flush: reuse rq queuelist in flush state machine chengming.zhou
2023-07-06 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-29 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] blk-mq: delete unused completion_data in struct request chengming.zhou
2023-07-06 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-06 14:31 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230629110359.1111832-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).