From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fs: stop using bdev->bd_super in mark_buffer_write_io_error
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:26:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807112625.652089-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807112625.652089-1-hch@lst.de>
bdev->bd_super is a somewhat awkward backpointer from a block device to
an owning file system with unclear rules.
For the buffer_head code we already have a good backpointer for the
inode that the buffer_head is associated with, even if it lives on the
block device mapping: b_assoc_map. It is used track dirty buffers
associated with an inode but living on the block device mapping like
directory buffers in ext4.
mark_buffer_write_io_error already uses it for the call to
mapping_set_error, and should be doing the same for the per-sb error
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/buffer.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index bd091329026c0f..f36ef03c078af6 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1225,19 +1225,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty);
void mark_buffer_write_io_error(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- struct super_block *sb;
-
set_buffer_write_io_error(bh);
/* FIXME: do we need to set this in both places? */
if (bh->b_folio && bh->b_folio->mapping)
mapping_set_error(bh->b_folio->mapping, -EIO);
- if (bh->b_assoc_map)
+ if (bh->b_assoc_map) {
mapping_set_error(bh->b_assoc_map, -EIO);
- rcu_read_lock();
- sb = READ_ONCE(bh->b_bdev->bd_super);
- if (sb)
- errseq_set(&sb->s_wb_err, -EIO);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ errseq_set(&bh->b_assoc_map->host->i_sb->s_wb_err, -EIO);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_write_io_error);
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 11:26 remove bdev->bd_super Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-07 11:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-08-07 11:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] ext4: don't use bdev->bd_super in __ext4_journal_get_write_access Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-08 14:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-08-07 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: stop using bdev->bd_super for journal error logging Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-08 0:54 ` Joseph Qi
2023-08-07 11:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs, block: remove bdev->bd_super Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-07 12:45 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-08 8:57 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230807112625.652089-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox