From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1421EC0015E for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229580AbjHIQLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:11:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229470AbjHIQLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:11:11 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA1319E for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6E3B86732D; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:11:05 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Chuck Lever , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block: Revert 615939a2ae73 Message-ID: <20230809161105.GA2304@lst.de> References: <169158653156.2034.8363987273532378512.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:51:18AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Bisected to commit 615939a2ae73 ("blk-mq: defer to the normal > > submission path for post-flush requests"). I've tested reverting > > that commit on several kernels from 0aa69d53ac7c ("Merge tag > > 'for-6.5/io_uring-2023-06-23' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux") to > > v6.5-rc5, and it seems to address the problem. > > > > I also confirmed that commit 9f87fc4d72f5 ("block: queue data > > commands from the flush state machine at the head") is still > > necessary. > > Adding the author - Christoph? Hmm, weird. I though we had all this sorted out a few weeks ago when that 9f87fc4d72f5 fixed it for you? What is different in this round of testing?