From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gjoyce@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jonathan.derrick@linux.dev,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix regression in sed-opal for a saved key.
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:02:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231003100209.380037-1-gmazyland@gmail.com> (raw)
The commit 3bfeb61256643281ac4be5b8a57e9d9da3db4335
introduced the use of keyring for sed-opal.
Unfortunately, there is also a possibility to save
the Opal key used in opal_lock_unlock().
This patch switches the order of operation, so the cached
key is used instead of failure for opal_get_key.
The problem was found by the cryptsetup Opal test recently
added to the cryptsetup tree.
Fixes: 3bfeb6125664 ("block: sed-opal: keyring support for SED keys")
Tested-by: Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
---
block/sed-opal.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
index 6d7f25d1711b..04f38a3f5d95 100644
--- a/block/sed-opal.c
+++ b/block/sed-opal.c
@@ -2888,12 +2888,11 @@ static int opal_lock_unlock(struct opal_dev *dev,
if (lk_unlk->session.who > OPAL_USER9)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = opal_get_key(dev, &lk_unlk->session.opal_key);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
opal_lock_check_for_saved_key(dev, lk_unlk);
- ret = __opal_lock_unlock(dev, lk_unlk);
+ ret = opal_get_key(dev, &lk_unlk->session.opal_key);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = __opal_lock_unlock(dev, lk_unlk);
mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
return ret;
--
2.42.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 10:02 Milan Broz [this message]
2023-10-04 14:07 ` [PATCH] block: Fix regression in sed-opal for a saved key Milan Broz
2023-10-04 20:28 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-04 20:54 ` Greg Joyce
2023-10-05 6:58 ` Milan Broz
2023-10-05 17:58 ` Greg Joyce
2023-10-11 8:30 ` Milan Broz
2023-10-13 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 14:38 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-10-13 9:39 ` Ondrej Kozina
2023-10-13 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231003100209.380037-1-gmazyland@gmail.com \
--to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okozina@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).