[PATCH v14 04/19] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone locking if necessary

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

Measurements have shown that limiting the queue depth to one per zone for
zoned writes has a significant negative performance impact on zoned UFS
devices. Hence this patch that disables zone locking by the mq-deadline
scheduler if the storage controller preserves the command order. This
patch is based on the following assumptions:
- It happens infrequently that zoned write requests are reordered by the
  block layer.
- The I/O priority of all write requests is the same per zone.
- Either no I/O scheduler is used or an I/O scheduler is used that
  serializes write requests per zone.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 block/mq-deadline.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index f958e79277b8..082ccf3186f4 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 		return NULL;
 
 	rq = rq_entry_fifo(per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -526,8 +526,9 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * For a zoned block device, if we only have writes queued and none of
-	 * them can be dispatched, rq will be NULL.
+	 * For a zoned block device that requires write serialization, if we
+	 * only have writes queued and none of them can be dispatched, rq will
+	 * be NULL.
 	 */
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
@@ -934,7 +935,7 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 	atomic_inc(&per_prio->stats.completed);
 
-	if (blk_queue_is_zoned(q)) {
+	if (rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);