From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: ensure a q_usage_counter reference is held when splitting bios
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:24:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240111172438.GA22255@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a2ab893-c4e1-4bc3-9c0a-556c62f8f921@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:18:31AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This also highlights a potential inefficiency in the patch, as now we're
> grabbing+dropping references when we don't need to. May not be a big
> deal, but it's one of the things that cached requests got rid of. Though
> I'm not quite sure how to refactor to get rid of that, as we'd need to
> shuffle the splitting and request get for that.
>
> Could you take another look at the series with that in mind?
I thought about it, but it gets pretty ugly quickly. bio_queue_enter
needs to move back into blk_mq_submit_bio, and then we'd skip it
initially if bio_may_exceed_limits is false, and then we later need
to add it back. (we'll probably also need to special case
blk_queue_bounce as that setting could change to. I wish we could
finally kill that)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 13:57 ensure q_usage_counter is held over bio splits Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_can_use_cached_rq Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: ensure a q_usage_counter reference is held when splitting bios Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:12 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-11 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-11 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 17:18 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-11 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-01-11 20:06 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-12 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-12 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-12 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-12 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-15 11:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-22 7:34 ` mmc vs highmem, was: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 9:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-22 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-23 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-24 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-24 12:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-24 13:16 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-24 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-24 12:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-24 13:49 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-24 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-11 22:22 ` Ming Lei
2024-01-12 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:03 ` ensure q_usage_counter is held over bio splits Jens Axboe
2024-01-14 14:38 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240111172438.GA22255@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox