From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhengtangquan@oppo.com, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zram: easy the allocation of zcomp_strm's buffers through vmalloc
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:14:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207031447.GA489524@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41226c84-e780-4408-b7d2-bd105f4834f5@kernel.dk>
On (24/02/06 19:40), Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/6/24 6:44 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (24/02/07 09:25), Barry Song wrote:
> >> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> >>
> >> Firstly, there is no need to keep zcomp_strm's buffers contiguous
> >> physically.
> >>
> >> Secondly, The recent mTHP project has provided the possibility to
> >> swapout and swapin large folios. Compressing/decompressing large
> >> blocks can hugely decrease CPU consumption and improve compression
> >> ratio. This requires us to make zRAM support the compression and
> >> decompression for large objects.
> >> With the support of large objects in zRAM of our out-of-tree code,
> >> we have observed many allocation failures during CPU hotplug as
> >> large objects need larger buffers. So this change is also more
> >> future-proof once we begin to bring up multiple sizes in zRAM.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> >
> > Note:
> > Taking it in NOT because of the out-of-tree code (we don't really
> > do that), but because this is executed from CPU offline/online
> > paths, which can happen on devices with fragmented memory (a valid
> > concern IMHO).
> >
> > Minchan, if you have any objections, please chime in.
>
> Not Minchan, but I do have an issue with the title of the commit, it
> doesn't make any sense. Can the maintainer please re-write that to be
> something that is appropriate and actually describes what the patch
> does?
Thanks Jens. I fully agree, I requested a better commit message in
v1 feedback, we probably still can improve on this.
Something like this?
---
zram: do not allocate physically contiguous strm buffers
Currently zram allocates 2 physically contigous pages per-CPU's
compression stream (we may have up to 3 streams per-CPU). Since
those buffers are per-CPU we allocate them from CPU hotplug path,
which may have higher risks of failed allocations on devices with
fragmented memory.
Switch to virtually contiguos allocations - crypto comp does not
seem impose requirements on compression working buffers to be
physically contiguous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 20:25 [PATCH v2] zram: easy the allocation of zcomp_strm's buffers through vmalloc Barry Song
2024-02-07 1:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-07 2:40 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 3:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2024-02-07 3:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 3:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-07 5:00 ` Barry Song
2024-02-07 4:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207031447.GA489524@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).