linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] null_blk: remove the bio based I/O path
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:05:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240215080555.GA10997@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zcz3pd3A09dJScHH@kbusch-mbp>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > @@ -2036,11 +1813,15 @@ static int null_validate_conf(struct nullb_device *dev)
> >  		pr_err("legacy IO path is no longer available\n");
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > +	if (dev->queue_mode == NULL_Q_BIO) {
> > +		pr_err("BIO-based IO path is no longer available, using blk-mq instead.\n");
> > +		dev->queue_mode = NULL_Q_MQ;
> > +	}
> 
> Seems pointless to keep dev->queue_mode around if only one value is
> valid.
> 
> Instead of checking the param here once per device, could we do it just
> once for the module in null_set_queue_mode()?

Maybe.  Note that the code would have to be quite a bit more complex
than this - not only due to configfs as noted by Damien, but also
because NULL_Q_BIO isn't rejected but simply ignored to not break
blktests.  I can look at this at parsing time, but my gut feeling
is that it's not worth the effort.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14  9:54 drop bio mode from null_blk and convert it to atomic queue limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14  9:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] null_blk: remove the bio based I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 11:25   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14 17:25   ` Keith Busch
2024-02-14 23:16     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14 23:34       ` Keith Busch
2024-02-15  8:05     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-02-14  9:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] null_blk: initialize the tag_set timeout in null_init_tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 11:26   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14  9:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] null_blk: refactor tag_set setup Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 11:29   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14  9:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] null_blk: remove null_gendisk_register Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 11:30   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14  9:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] null_blk: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 11:32   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14 14:08 ` drop bio mode from null_blk and convert it to atomic queue limits Johannes Thumshirn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-19  6:29 drop bio mode from null_blk and convert it to atomic queue limits v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] null_blk: remove the bio based I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20  5:32 drop bio mode from null_blk and convert it to atomic queue limits v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20  5:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] null_blk: remove the bio based I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20  7:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-20  9:32 drop bio mode from null_blk and convert it to atomic queue limits v4 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20  9:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] null_blk: remove the bio based I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20 11:02   ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240215080555.GA10997@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).