From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613A3101E2; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708591905; cv=none; b=psBViqXCg9SAB/RYI0KTJknWFc+SShyqR3FMzVS9Y0OsLIn5jLTFH5/FiK+DoGY1VdoEXr+85dBEzbgt6Wq8Vff6GBNGA4FRJ9XNELJsnyCXKnjva+EjVI4Tdwpd+1Jk+x6afiTAbg0KHpl0Gxv16Q7FKm/qSF9eqXF5JbTct1k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708591905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JoxFkXKK1G2eYE+0iXjJP6VvOtWDkSC6kFkAL0Sn46s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DlXm8VtT7c85PnjWwqKs/WjklcOZ0A3vTWuM+6uzZzSEcTWUs2my5r73oa20rWvWOVKO/T5s8+SF3Wpd1oxt14tco6pQG8NM6MjZ+ydHMr8X2z4ZB87so6O2e4Z885a2IWQT08FWzhBqkVu07vX0PcKPhE/5KY4ehE07qZbEC9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cKfyJXhp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cKfyJXhp" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F35CBC433F1; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:51:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708591904; bh=JoxFkXKK1G2eYE+0iXjJP6VvOtWDkSC6kFkAL0Sn46s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cKfyJXhpwlkE/PHdOyJPjp9icGsKUDkLJ9wNQRmoUxvLz84Q6NqdwerTU4GToBvED J6JSfqp8e8+hMpo3bilBSHMsc68Wjd6q9x4iPK70hlZMkQXTwnaSkRL3X5+8SLlreX bGComPLy1GC9YDOX220c3e8HmAA4EIF8U4jwJL6nES9+GKfzoTvi4P4T7ElManM2Oo AUTYqkU9lpAg/A4Q+WpDUg6Os7qQU8mAHPyDEbyT7gAMBKhFEsRtHA9mioQZJSx2R1 S8vAwbGEJGt/7tpY8rzxuCTM+v/dhVNl6XGKwR6YDSJCodXl7TtCX6fG6jzDl7gxHt I0+PIx7lHy34w== Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:51:39 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Daejun Park , Kanchan Joshi , Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever , Stephen Rothwell , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/19] fs: Fix rw_hint validation Message-ID: <20240222-hamster-rosafarben-fe5b5766613f@brauner> References: <20240130214911.1863909-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240130214911.1863909-2-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240131-skilift-decken-cf3d638ce40c@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 06:46:51PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 1/31/24 05:56, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The fs parts of this should go through a vfs tree as this is vfs infra. > > I can then give you a stable tag that you can merge and base the big > > block and scsci bits on. It'll minimize merge conflicts and makes it > > easier to coordinate imho. > > Hi Christian, > > It would be appreciated if such a stable tag could be created on the vfs.rw > branch. Isn't the stable branch enough I gave you weeks ago? It's usually what I do with Jens. But fwiw, see I've added the vfs-6.9.rw_hint tag. Pushed.