From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACDAF9E9 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715735053; cv=none; b=CStTDwBhB3cfn5A+pU43y06dF2BnDZRgozQUp327YVYEn2OexDN1oPENiqTYY6V0/rAygmJBpcmDVAOiHXBsuauEdO4ZmEIgmvGWQz9MY0Ab9XAfYKa2BKU3L9lnE1SeBvTbIp0+arQFjlg8MykxbbjxGV/s+juHvpJ5h1uptfU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715735053; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JR0EyROUPsAs/gj4aRFKaKKp/XxKJGSvUQck05tirXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j+UU/QpboI9gAxkgLY3JAWs9TS0qrwukRmRRwHRuaf0Rbg8u62dvkSJkuWJzSj4e7JlTENQocycDJzaNhIdnCCfP8CXVf6vS+9u036gKmb2lBYii/RxkeBDTc0gA7zonYLuBsiEIQzaS0kYzUV5qOvSVxLAmwJd1CS4pwLc6thY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=b7M0+NtJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="b7M0+NtJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715735052; x=1747271052; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JR0EyROUPsAs/gj4aRFKaKKp/XxKJGSvUQck05tirXY=; b=b7M0+NtJYn/MnUdPybIfVMUGP4RW7aWrLbTVsmm2PlTj+vClGXlII55d ihAEiXsq8nZXmVC+01weW+k7ZEyN68e92K5y97PaIBVxPsZhtDQ4XePDI 82N9/KfPEQIAE2rMHzLrG5XcnZfINGwzhWhcnSHITfvudVBMtQl8xa1I2 vI4LSw652kutijqXb8Duq+RRDH26JeOTFfsf9IFdqox4K0Gu3jQp5U0Nc 3wWz5zUmZNMfDYdGHBtgpyOFtKodGXAsbwHA4qVVjxOH884mnWxty4Xni bvGi+6iqlvNf05IE7cNrrecplh/1fXnzA+BSbcTLMML/B34DAc+X915KP g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gz034bQ8Qp+T34EVDN7W3Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AgqoHIDpTnuywc28kk55Bg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11073"; a="11614522" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="11614522" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2024 18:04:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SdpTbBksTFazk3jzjJepSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Drlff/oITP2CaBqvcdteBw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="30943297" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2024 18:04:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s733u-000CBL-1S; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:03:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Hannes Reinecke , Jens Axboe Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Matthew Wilcox , Luis Chamberlain , Pankaj Raghav , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize Message-ID: <202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> Hi Hannes, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.9] [cannot apply to next-20240514] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hannes-Reinecke/fs-mpage-avoid-negative-shift-for-large-blocksize/20240515-014146 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240514173900.62207-6-hare%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project b910bebc300dafb30569cecc3017b446ea8eafa0) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from block/bdev.c:9: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2210: include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ block/bdev.c:145:2: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 145 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ >> block/bdev.c:152:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bs' 152 | if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || | ^ block/bdev.c:164:3: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 164 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ 13 warnings and 3 errors generated. vim +/bs +152 block/bdev.c 148 149 int set_blocksize(struct block_device *bdev, int size) 150 { 151 /* Size must be a power of two, and between 512 and MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER*/ > 152 if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || 153 !is_power_of_2(size)) 154 return -EINVAL; 155 156 /* Size cannot be smaller than the size supported by the device */ 157 if (size < bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) 158 return -EINVAL; 159 160 /* Don't change the size if it is same as current */ 161 if (bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits != blksize_bits(size)) { 162 sync_blockdev(bdev); 163 bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits = blksize_bits(size); 164 mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 165 get_order(size)); 166 kill_bdev(bdev); 167 } 168 return 0; 169 } 170 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki