From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F23381B9 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 04:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715745693; cv=none; b=IMLrgfo87XjcQawbtaejGp4CY4miUZTViXQhoGxJ9aXvZdDP6CQ/3b/Zn/KpWwvRXjCbjbFAZw/CYp6wZHAoj0AnnALRcMBm3I5NLQ+AukbImAmUfhT698FODuzKus/ThXCaxtjR8HQJVOd/htYKFnks/86C/4C7y4dBiFbIV/s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715745693; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i4o5o8/E/agz++Q0onYaGr6q+aONflbBNmjrrJGqeJ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aOp6a7tcXzZlMOxGHVcK7HSSY5/w+kU82oxK6H22h95oKwMpZ10Y+p90nrPbzrxyaYQEa45OLMXUC3F74vz//l2ukHnnMOku2NELYRf0kr4uMSwkdekVzD/mxVKwwVM7bmo/XK+hLH9YFH17Sj9dAYOeOocf+VUe7ijfC0/FYsk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ktb+spZq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ktb+spZq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715745690; x=1747281690; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=i4o5o8/E/agz++Q0onYaGr6q+aONflbBNmjrrJGqeJ8=; b=ktb+spZqEOR6TiK5oUxo/NueFaQk9GMB45pPH/uWwQBwJSUuXVPzoTi8 rPiUR4ntMh5iGbfHUvUG3+UnwSTO/n23hMMY1ijTMC9YlMBlkIATDKLlS jwD4dleQ7gcq+B1Ysq9SzDnMjKgzpVvpdZ6HH3X1NT9n+WFSb4WBv2zN8 6cVeirmZyTKs2phQzwTJBC7rxaRsvBXz3n2tjUHrCdE1QdBgMfhLOl0UZ llziJdk7lteEJDm1/GjdICo4w9T3qyx5qWvZgv1UHTSLmz1oT4LKs+Ex9 XN65shT0GaO8oaiLnCKOyoXF8RjMNYrML0Mj3uI/VoatwLLOZbXK9IeCA g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ybSd1JI8RouVIaSq2nGs8g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MvhohhJcSo60mWtZjW2iNQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11073"; a="15605254" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="15605254" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2024 21:01:23 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eoBQM39LSJ2YM2c1j8zSrg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3rlZ+wnqQrCLAeRrJQSEJA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="31330119" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2024 21:01:20 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s75pO-000COd-0o; Wed, 15 May 2024 04:01:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 12:00:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Hannes Reinecke , Jens Axboe Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Matthew Wilcox , Luis Chamberlain , Pankaj Raghav , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize Message-ID: <202405151142.8COQSJsa-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> Hi Hannes, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.9] [cannot apply to next-20240514] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hannes-Reinecke/fs-mpage-avoid-negative-shift-for-large-blocksize/20240515-014146 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240514173900.62207-6-hare%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405151142.8COQSJsa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405151142.8COQSJsa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405151142.8COQSJsa-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): block/bdev.c: In function 'set_init_blocksize': block/bdev.c:145:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 145 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/bdev.c: In function 'set_blocksize': >> block/bdev.c:152:23: error: 'bs' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'abs'? 152 | if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || | ^~ | abs block/bdev.c:152:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +152 block/bdev.c 148 149 int set_blocksize(struct block_device *bdev, int size) 150 { 151 /* Size must be a power of two, and between 512 and MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER*/ > 152 if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || 153 !is_power_of_2(size)) 154 return -EINVAL; 155 156 /* Size cannot be smaller than the size supported by the device */ 157 if (size < bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) 158 return -EINVAL; 159 160 /* Don't change the size if it is same as current */ 161 if (bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits != blksize_bits(size)) { 162 sync_blockdev(bdev); 163 bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits = blksize_bits(size); 164 mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 165 get_order(size)); 166 kill_bdev(bdev); 167 } 168 return 0; 169 } 170 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki