From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com (mail-pl1-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32A9803 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720409555; cv=none; b=KL4wgXynUBxbxA5Qj6a6vlnJAxMZNu0Lp36gQkz6lQCajBsOSxTDKV7J9TuuR5cSq/4FM2pPTKTHQwiI7mOzMh2vIR48VC7UGxroTcFVM1NGMdzHXdu1DfQ2ePuNuxbIrPziTIUfhlGv23iRyyHQHYn6NpN0N7IDqyqwTgEopXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720409555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5uPJt6ndXC3JLmQO14ovBQlb/bFzah8Bquk6QpCYuQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RQYsdnGRn+/0SBuN2VPgeThceU/FR8DnKMkic1vQNJQxeyw1RInXpplWeekCcYkTJsQ843BEB26TKks+NEQUxSHeLpZx06YrTOATuvNxjkmJk3tVRdB03tF8av3Sl0PPWLKsapVm5bvl3xydJg45wOIrQ/EwVqb/fWlLvxSRRmk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=g8HneZJX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="g8HneZJX" Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb70169c23so3073415ad.1 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:32:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1720409553; x=1721014353; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zXCHivUeTgzK2s7c5iMX6VZA50wGYQ3SoObiW0cz39M=; b=g8HneZJXvQZdZ5ZgHsi/2Qds4AmXsVmpQehbE69Z0g/bLLB1QaaDN/3CFDRRxrSRk5 MbeXOC8Ehw6JnmDZjN3CIhqNE0jek04v0C2r4ZdlrYOsTaWs5SF+yYZqk+z4vTVHrDwA O90Yb4o02csvYZoJJ06e4/bq4uqSZsFNuugfY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720409553; x=1721014353; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zXCHivUeTgzK2s7c5iMX6VZA50wGYQ3SoObiW0cz39M=; b=KAveYuVoOq0/H6olpl3srYfvoq5qHCHSaLJC0Mb/5OA8sNQWSdDXW00PhlxvFnS3cg bdm9yPYJDOwKqHM2XkKw7RRQnVBW6lQyrDekscTQ804HNUXL8ajtBUZt2rS/pdpMoOI1 mMxIxNjFL8ubpJtiXBDxvjiUy/Mr41qbuWOSjDrOvujVzanUqAIf0OKvj5WZU5l/wPHs I4qqGz0IOShYga0RDv55GT2DUbXxDJv7HLWcJ8HmOK9pJOE5XqBbxSFZXT8sw0ZQBvmN JqbiXlbOTbQzs1iJonRRBoEOw1DU2Xjj7EriTs62aPo2B06ye699b104WfidVRd03wF/ ThBQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUkdmTL2F0w/xgEjMg1B5bAa6LTjY/5y97NhdpdYu2BV3w2ZEfn2amlGgGwPAefRMVa/wT4DUiOnpaEegKdoawUZKf59pHXO4G+2pk= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycG9SlRYe6jVLgJiLpQN7HuSnWG0Vk8m9WvPOeH3Q2av/7iLsl /Si3zciB4wmF+ehM3Dmojnj2Vy9YRtylNbdST5S1ji9E1aF23AiezExs0dySjw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQ9icmnoYZ5EiPLnYtHgy8R0QJ1szKIWGaEQlf865q5Czazs3nuA+XujWtDqFqWgak8oR8kA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d512:b0:1fb:5c3d:b8ea with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb5c3dc4aamr28446625ad.13.1720409553127; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2401:fa00:8f:203:eda0:6e46:c522:d0b1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1fb27bdc357sm75660155ad.177.2024.07.07.20.32.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:32:28 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Alexander Lobakin , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t. Message-ID: <20240708033228.GB797471@google.com> References: <20240620153556.777272-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20240620153556.777272-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <27fb4f62-d656-449c-9f3c-5d0b61a88cca@intel.com> <20240704121908.GjH4p40u@linutronix.de> <801cac51-1bd3-4f79-8474-251a7a81ca08@intel.com> <20240708030330.GA797471@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240708030330.GA797471@google.com> On (24/07/08 12:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: [..] > > I meant > > > > for (size_t index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) > > > > It's allowed and even recommended for a couple years already. > > I wonder since when? Do gcc 5.1 and clang 13.0.1 support this? Since C99. gcc 5.1/clang 13.0.1 are fine with that. TIL.