linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
	krisman@suse.de, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:35:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240824083553.GF8805@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823103811.2421-8-anuj20.g@samsung.com>

This patch came in twice, once with a "block" and once with a
"block,nvme" prefix.  One should be fine, and I think just block is
the right one.

How do we communicate what flags can be combined to the upper layer
and userspace given the SCSI limitations here?

> --- a/include/linux/bio-integrity.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio-integrity.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ enum bip_flags {
>  	BIP_DISK_NOCHECK	= 1 << 3, /* disable disk integrity checking */
>  	BIP_IP_CHECKSUM		= 1 << 4, /* IP checksum */
>  	BIP_COPY_USER		= 1 << 5, /* Kernel bounce buffer in use */
> +	BIP_CHECK_GUARD		= 1 << 6,
> +	BIP_CHECK_REFTAG	= 1 << 7,
> +	BIP_CHECK_APPTAG	= 1 << 8,

Maybe describe the flags here like the other ones?


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-24  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240823104552epcas5p226dbbbd448cd0ee0955ffdd3ad1b112d@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: introduce a helper to determine metadata bytes from data iter Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:06     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: handle split correctly for user meta bounce buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 11:18       ` Anuj Gupta
2024-08-29  4:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send meta along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:35     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-08-28 13:42       ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-08-29  3:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29  4:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 13:29           ` Anuj gupta
2024-09-12 12:40             ` Anuj Gupta
2024-09-13  2:06             ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29  4:06         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block,nvme: " Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 08/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 09/10] nvme: add handling for app_tag Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:00     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29 10:18       ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-13  2:05         ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 10/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:52     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240824083553.GF8805@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).