From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] Block: switch bd_prepare_to_claim to use wait_var_event_mutex()
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:31:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240826063659.15327-8-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240826063659.15327-1-neilb@suse.de>
bd_prepare_to_claim() contains an open-coded version of the new
wait_var_event_mutex().
Change it to use that function and re-organise the code to benefit from
this change.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
block/bdev.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
index 21e688fb6449..6e827ee02e7d 100644
--- a/block/bdev.c
+++ b/block/bdev.c
@@ -487,10 +487,10 @@ long nr_blockdev_pages(void)
* Test whether @bdev can be claimed by @holder.
*
* RETURNS:
- * %true if @bdev can be claimed, %false otherwise.
+ * %0 if @bdev can be claimed, %-EBUSY otherwise.
*/
-static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
- const struct blk_holder_ops *hops)
+static int bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
+ const struct blk_holder_ops *hops)
{
struct block_device *whole = bdev_whole(bdev);
@@ -503,9 +503,9 @@ static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
if (bdev->bd_holder == holder) {
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bdev->bd_holder_ops != hops))
return false;
- return true;
+ return 0;
}
- return false;
+ return -EBUSY;
}
/*
@@ -514,8 +514,8 @@ static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
*/
if (whole != bdev &&
whole->bd_holder && whole->bd_holder != bd_may_claim)
- return false;
- return true;
+ return -EBUSY;
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -535,43 +535,32 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
const struct blk_holder_ops *hops)
{
struct block_device *whole = bdev_whole(bdev);
+ int err = 0;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!holder))
return -EINVAL;
-retry:
- mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
- /* if someone else claimed, fail */
- if (!bd_may_claim(bdev, holder, hops)) {
- mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
- /* if claiming is already in progress, wait for it to finish */
- if (whole->bd_claiming) {
- wait_queue_head_t *wq = __var_waitqueue(&whole->bd_claiming);
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-
- prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
- schedule();
- finish_wait(wq, &wait);
- goto retry;
- }
+ mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
+ wait_var_event_mutex(&whole->bd_claiming,
+ (err = bd_may_claim(bdev, holder, hops)) != 0 ||
+ whole->bd_claiming == NULL,
+ &bdev_lock);
- /* yay, all mine */
- whole->bd_claiming = holder;
+ /* if someone else claimed, fail */
+ if (!err)
+ /* yay, all mine */
+ whole->bd_claiming = holder;
mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
- return 0;
+ return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bd_prepare_to_claim); /* only for the loop driver */
static void bd_clear_claiming(struct block_device *whole, void *holder)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&bdev_lock);
/* tell others that we're done */
BUG_ON(whole->bd_claiming != holder);
whole->bd_claiming = NULL;
- wake_up_var(&whole->bd_claiming);
+ wake_up_var_locked(&whole->bd_claiming, &bdev_lock);
}
/**
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 6:30 [PATCH 0/7 v2 RFC] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: change wait on bd_claiming to use a var_waitqueue, not a bit_waitqueue NeilBrown
2024-09-17 3:12 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-17 21:54 ` NeilBrown
2024-09-17 3:13 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
2024-08-26 6:30 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: change wake_up_bit() and related function to expect unsigned long * NeilBrown
2024-09-16 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-16 11:48 ` NeilBrown
2024-09-16 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-16 20:37 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: Improve documentation for wake_up_bit/wait_on_bit family of functions NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: Document wait_var_event() family of functions and wake_up_var() NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Add test_and_clear_wake_up_bit() and atomic_dec_and_wake_up() NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Add wait/wake interface for variable updated under a lock NeilBrown
2024-08-26 6:31 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-09-15 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2 RFC] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240826063659.15327-8-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox