From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: block: del_gendisk() vs blk_queue_enter() race condition
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:56:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003085610.GK11458@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
I'm looking at a report from the fleet (don't have a reproducer)
and wondering what you and block folks might think / suggest.
The problem is basically as follows
CPU0
do_syscall
sys_close
__fput
blkdev_release
blkdev_put grabs ->open_mutex
sr_block_release
scsi_set_medium_removal
ioctl_internal_command
scsi_execute_cmd
scsi_alloc_request
blk_mq_alloc_request
blk_queue_enter
schedule
at the same time:
CPU1
usb_disconnect
usb_disable_device
device_del
usb_unbind_interface
usb_stor_disconnect
scsi_remove_host
scsi_forget_host
__scsi_remove_device
device_del
bus_remove_device
device_release_driver_internal
sr_remove
del_gendisk
mutex_lock attempts to grab ->open_mutex
schedule
blk_queue_enter() sleeps forever, under ->open_mutex, there is no
way for it to be woken up and to detect blk_queue_dying(). del_gendisk()
sleeps forever because it attempts to grab ->open_mutex before it calls
__blk_mark_disk_dead(), which would mark the queue QUEUE_FLAG_DYING and
wake up ->mq_freeze_wq (which is blk_queue_enter() in this case).
I wonder how to fix it. My current "patch" is to set QUEUE_FLAG_DYING
and "kick" ->mq_freeze_wq early on in del_gendisk(), before it attempts
to grab ->open_mutex for the first time.
Any suggestions?
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 8:56 Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2024-10-03 13:36 ` block: del_gendisk() vs blk_queue_enter() race condition Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 14:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-03 14:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-04 4:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-04 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 7:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-04 7:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-04 12:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 14:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-07 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07 9:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-08 5:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-04 14:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-03 13:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-08 4:02 ` YangYang
2024-10-08 5:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-08 5:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-08 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 6:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-08 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003085610.GK11458@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).