From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:24:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007182419.3263186-1-ushankar@purestorage.com> (raw)
ublk currently supports the following behaviors on ublk server exit:
A: outstanding I/Os get errors, subsequently issued I/Os get errors
B: outstanding I/Os get errors, subsequently issued I/Os queue
C: outstanding I/Os get reissued, subsequently issued I/Os queue
and the following behaviors for recovery of preexisting block devices by
a future incarnation of the ublk server:
1: ublk devices stopped on ublk server exit (no recovery possible)
2: ublk devices are recoverable using start/end_recovery commands
The userspace interface allows selection of combinations of these
behaviors using flags specified at device creation time, namely:
default behavior: A + 1
UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY: B + 2
UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY|UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE: C + 2
A + 2 is a currently unsupported behavior. This patch series aims to add
support for it.
Userspace support and testing for this flag are available at:
https://github.com/ublk-org/ublksrv/pull/73
Uday Shankar (5):
ublk: check recovery flags for validity
ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers
ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work
ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing
Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO
Documentation/block/ublk.rst | 24 +++--
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 18 ++++
3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
base-commit: 8faa82888e7109d91902260ecffd12291abb4bf6
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 18:24 Uday Shankar [this message]
2024-10-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Uday Shankar
2024-10-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers Uday Shankar
2024-10-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work Uday Shankar
2024-10-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-10-08 2:48 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO Uday Shankar
2024-10-08 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-08 15:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241007182419.3263186-1-ushankar@purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox