From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
YangYang <yang.yang@vivo.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 21:31:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009123123.GD565009@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009113831.557606-2-hch@lst.de>
On (24/10/09 13:38), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[..]
> @@ -589,8 +589,16 @@ static void __blk_mark_disk_dead(struct gendisk *disk)
> if (test_and_set_bit(GD_DEAD, &disk->state))
> return;
>
> - if (test_bit(GD_OWNS_QUEUE, &disk->state))
> - blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DYING, disk->queue);
> + /*
> + * Also mark the disk dead if it is not owned by the gendisk. This
> + * means we can't allow /dev/sg passthrough or SCSI internal commands
> + * while unbinding a ULP. That is more than just a bit ugly, but until
> + * we untangle q_usage_counter into one owned by the disk and one owned
> + * by the queue this is as good as it gets. The flag will be cleared
> + * at the end of del_gendisk if it wasn't set before.
> + */
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DYING, &disk->queue->queue_flags))
> + set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_RESURRECT, &disk->queue->queue_flags);
>
> /*
> * Stop buffered writers from dirtying pages that can't be written out.
> @@ -719,6 +727,10 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
> * again. Else leave the queue frozen to fail all I/O.
> */
> if (!test_bit(GD_OWNS_QUEUE, &disk->state)) {
> + if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_RESURRECT, &q->queue_flags)) {
> + clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DYING, &q->queue_flags);
> + clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_RESURRECT, &q->queue_flags);
> + }
Christoph, shouldn't QUEUE_FLAG_RESURRECT handling be outside of
GD_OWNS_QUEUE if-block? Because __blk_mark_disk_dead() sets
QUEUE_FLAG_DYING/QUEUE_FLAG_RESURRECT regardless of GD_OWNS_QUEUE.
// A silly nit: it seems the code uses blk_queue_flag_set() and
// blk_queue_flag_clear() helpers, but there is no queue_flag_test(),
// I don't know what if the preference here - stick to queue_flag
// helpers, or is it ok to mix them.
> blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_INIT_DONE, q);
> __blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, true);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 11:38 try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 12:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2024-10-09 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 12:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 13:49 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-16 4:14 ` YangYang
2024-10-16 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-16 12:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16 12:49 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-16 13:35 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 1:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 12:32 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 12:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 12:50 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 12:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 13:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 13:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 15:03 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 15:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 15:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-28 5:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: mark the disk dead before taking open_mutx in del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16 4:15 ` YangYang
2024-10-16 2:09 ` try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks v2 Sergey Senozhatsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-08 11:57 RFC: try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 5:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241009123123.GD565009@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang.yang@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).